Mats Moraing vs Pedro Martinez — Amersfoort CH Quarter-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER5
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Pedro Martinez
ESP1
Pedro Martinez
#157ATP
1580ELO
1550Clay ELO
$335kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
Moraing M.
6-4 6-2
Martinez P.
Moraing M.
662
Martinez P.
420

Mats Moraing defeated Pedro Martinez 6-4 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Martinez P.

Martinez P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Moraing M.Martinez P.
—
Serve
4
—
Return
42

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Martinez P.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.1
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Martinez P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
94
Break points won·Clear edge
18
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
66
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Moraing M.Martinez P.
Freshness·
—
82

Martinez P.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1