Shintaro Imai vs Alejandro Tabilo — Gatineau CH Round of 64

Gatineau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
JPN
Shintaro Imai
#801ATP
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
hard
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1750Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Imai S.
6-4 2-6 7-5
Tabilo A.
Imai S.
6272
Tabilo A.
4651

Shintaro Imai defeated Alejandro Tabilo 6-4 2-6 7-5 in the Gatineau CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alejandro Tabilo came in ranked #31.

Key context

  • Match story: Shintaro Imai closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Imai S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Tabilo A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Imai S.

Serve advantage — Tabilo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Imai S.Tabilo A.
—
Serve
51
—
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Imai S.Tabilo A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Imai S.Tabilo A.
Freshness·
—
98

Tabilo A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[10]
Couacaud E.[15]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[10]
Menezes J.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.[15]
King D.[12]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
King D.[12]
Janvier M.[13]
6-31-66-1
Couacaud E.[15]
Polmans M.[11]
6-16-4
Menezes J.
Gombos N.[6]
4-67-57-5
Kubler J.[10]
Lee D.[16]
6-26-3
R16
Gombos N.[6]
Neuchrist M.
7-656-3
Menezes J.
Polansky P.[3]
4-66-46-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Kwon S.[2]
7-57-5
Polmans M.[11]
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-1
Janvier M.[13]
Mmoh M.[4]
7-55-76-4
King D.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-66-26-3
Kubler J.[10]
Sela D.[5]
6-27-5
Lee D.[16]
Galarneau A.
6-37-5
R32
Sela D.[5]
Redlicki M.
6-26-1
Kwon S.[2]
Imai S.
6-26-3
King D.[12]
Draxl L.
3-67-56-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-3
Ilkel C.
Torpegaard M.[7]
6-44-66-2
Mmoh M.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Janvier M.[13]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-3
Uchiyama Y.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Mansouri S.
6-06-4
Neuchrist M.
Klein B.
6-47-5
Menezes J.
Harris A.
4-66-36-4
Polansky P.[3]
Uchida K.
5-76-26-1
Kubler J.[10]
Moriya H.
6-26-2
Lee D.[16]
Escobedo E.
6-44-67-64
Galarneau A.
Hoang A.[1]
6-33-67-64
R64
Galarneau A.
Barrios Vera T.
7-52-66-3
Gojo B.
Sigouin B.
5-76-36-2
Imai S.
Tabilo A.
6-42-67-5
Menezes J.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Santillan A.
3-66-36-1
Ilkel C.
Banes M.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-17-61
Draxl L.
Arconada J.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.
Grills J.
6-766-16-0
Mansouri S.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Neuchrist M.
Li Z.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Petrovic D.
6-34-67-5
Moriya H.
Hoyt E.
6-16-4
Escobedo E.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3