Marc Polmans vs Cem Ilkel — Gatineau CH Round of 16

Gatineau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marc Polmans
AUS11
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Polmans M.
6-3 1-6 6-1
Ilkel C.
Polmans M.
6162
Ilkel C.
3611

Marc Polmans defeated Cem Ilkel 6-3 1-6 6-1 in the Gatineau CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marc Polmans closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polmans M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polmans M.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polmans M.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
32
Break points saved·Dominant
79
49
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Polmans M.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
100
—

Polmans M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[10]
Couacaud E.[15]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[10]
Menezes J.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.[15]
King D.[12]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
King D.[12]
Janvier M.[13]
6-31-66-1
Couacaud E.[15]
Polmans M.[11]
6-16-4
Menezes J.
Gombos N.[6]
4-67-57-5
Kubler J.[10]
Lee D.[16]
6-26-3
R16
Gombos N.[6]
Neuchrist M.
7-656-3
Menezes J.
Polansky P.[3]
4-66-46-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Kwon S.[2]
7-57-5
Polmans M.[11]
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-1
Janvier M.[13]
Mmoh M.[4]
7-55-76-4
King D.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-66-26-3
Kubler J.[10]
Sela D.[5]
6-27-5
Lee D.[16]
Galarneau A.
6-37-5
R32
Sela D.[5]
Redlicki M.
6-26-1
Kwon S.[2]
Imai S.
6-26-3
King D.[12]
Draxl L.
3-67-56-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-3
Ilkel C.
Torpegaard M.[7]
6-44-66-2
Mmoh M.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Janvier M.[13]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-3
Uchiyama Y.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Mansouri S.
6-06-4
Neuchrist M.
Klein B.
6-47-5
Menezes J.
Harris A.
4-66-36-4
Polansky P.[3]
Uchida K.
5-76-26-1
Kubler J.[10]
Moriya H.
6-26-2
Lee D.[16]
Escobedo E.
6-44-67-64
Galarneau A.
Hoang A.[1]
6-33-67-64
R64
Galarneau A.
Barrios Vera T.
7-52-66-3
Gojo B.
Sigouin B.
5-76-36-2
Imai S.
Tabilo A.
6-42-67-5
Menezes J.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Santillan A.
3-66-36-1
Ilkel C.
Banes M.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-17-61
Draxl L.
Arconada J.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.
Grills J.
6-766-16-0
Mansouri S.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Neuchrist M.
Li Z.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Petrovic D.
6-34-67-5
Moriya H.
Hoyt E.
6-16-4
Escobedo E.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3