Francesco Forti vs Zsombor Piros — San Benedetto CH Round of 64

San Benedetto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Francesco Forti
ITA
Francesco Forti
#380ATP
1399ELO
1372Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Forti F.
4-6 6-1 6-2
Piros Z.
Forti F.
4662
Piros Z.
6121

Francesco Forti defeated Zsombor Piros 4-6 6-1 6-2 in the San Benedetto CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forti F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Forti F.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forti F.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (165 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forti F.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
84
Break points won·Dominant
2
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
71
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Forti F.Piros Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
73
54

Forti F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 66 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Olivo R.
Giannessi A.[3]
5-77-646-4
Semi-finals
Giannessi A.[3]
Martin A.[1]
6-736-17-68
Olivo R.
Gaio F.[4]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[1]
Roca Batalla O.
6-47-5
Olivo R.
Satral J.
6-16-3
Giannessi A.[3]
Arnaboldi A.[8]
5-76-37-63
Gaio F.[4]
Marcora R.[7]
6-26-4
R16
Martin A.[1]
Muller A.[16]
6-36-2
Satral J.
Dutra Silva R.[10]
6-25-76-4
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Giraldo S.[11]
4-66-37-63
Olivo R.
Forti F.
7-57-5
Gaio F.[4]
Hernandez J.[14]
6-16-4
Marcora R.[7]
Pellegrino A.
7-656-4
Giannessi A.[3]
Guinard M.
6-34-66-3
Roca Batalla O.
Vavassori A.
7-656-3
R32
Olivo R.
Quinzi G.[13]
6-31-0
Satral J.
Gomez E.[6]
2-3
Guinard M.
Wu T.[15]
7-617-63
Marcora R.[7]
Collarini A.
6-46-4
Giraldo S.[11]
Varillas J.
6-46-2
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Bonadio R.
6-34-66-4
Forti F.
Mager G.[2]
6-36-2
Dutra Silva R.[10]
Galan D.
6-23-66-3
Gaio F.[4]
Sakamoto P.
7-634-66-1
Hernandez J.[14]
Seyboth Wild T.
1-67-666-3
Pellegrino A.
Vanni L.[9]
7-56-4
Giannessi A.[3]
Oconnell C.
7-646-3
Vavassori A.
Coria F.[5]
6-47-64
Roca Batalla O.
Krstin P.[12]
6-37-66
Muller A.[16]
Zeppieri G.
7-656-2
Martin A.[1]
Vanneste J.
6-26-4
R64
Vanneste J.
Molcan A.
6-02-2
Sakamoto P.
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Taberner C.
6-06-2
Bonadio R.
Nedelko I.
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Musetti L.
6-22-67-5
Roca Batalla O.
Safranek V.
6-36-3
Olivo R.
Durasovic V.
6-37-5
Galan D.
Trusendi W.
3-66-36-3
Varillas J.
Cervantes Huegun I.
4-66-46-2
Forti F.
Piros Z.
4-66-16-2
Satral J.
Safiullin R.
6-46-4
Zeppieri G.
Basso A.
4-67-56-1
Pellegrino A.
Bega A.
7-56-3
Vavassori A.
Ramazzotti S.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.
Balzerani R.
7-56-3
Collarini A.
Rondoni P.
6-44-66-4