Sebastian Fanselow vs Ryan Nijboer — Amersfoort CH Round of 64

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Ryan Nijboer
NED
Ryan Nijboer
#488ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWWWL
Fanselow S.
6-4 6-2
Nijboer R.
Fanselow S.
662
Nijboer R.
420

Sebastian Fanselow defeated Ryan Nijboer 6-4 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fanselow S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nijboer R.

Nijboer R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fanselow S.Nijboer R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fanselow S.Nijboer R.
Clutch Rating·Even
4
0
Break points saved·Even
31
35
Break points won·Slight edge
5
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
22
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fanselow S.Nijboer R.
Freshness·
—
67

Nijboer R.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1