Sebastian Fanselow vs Tallon Griekspoor — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Tallon Griekspoor
NED4
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
Fanselow S.
1-6 6-4 6-3
Griekspoor T.
Fanselow S.
1662
Griekspoor T.
6431

Sebastian Fanselow defeated Tallon Griekspoor 1-6 6-4 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in ranked #57.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fanselow S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Griekspoor T.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Serve advantage — Griekspoor T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fanselow S.Griekspoor T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
8.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fanselow S.Griekspoor T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
76
Break points saved·Dominant
31
99
Break points won·Dominant
5
34
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fanselow S.Griekspoor T.
Freshness·
—
96

Griekspoor T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1