Jason Kubler vs Enzo Couacaud — Gatineau CH Final

Gatineau CH · CHALLENGER · Final
AUS10
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
hard
FRA15
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
Kubler J.
6-4 6-4
Couacaud E.
Kubler J.
662
Couacaud E.
440

Jason Kubler defeated Enzo Couacaud 6-4 6-4 in the Gatineau CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jason Kubler came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Couacaud E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Couacaud E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Couacaud E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
79
Break points won·Clear edge
46
29
Deciding sets·Even
79
77
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
37
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[10]
Couacaud E.[15]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[10]
Menezes J.
6-36-1
Couacaud E.[15]
King D.[12]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
King D.[12]
Janvier M.[13]
6-31-66-1
Couacaud E.[15]
Polmans M.[11]
6-16-4
Menezes J.
Gombos N.[6]
4-67-57-5
Kubler J.[10]
Lee D.[16]
6-26-3
R16
Gombos N.[6]
Neuchrist M.
7-656-3
Menezes J.
Polansky P.[3]
4-66-46-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Kwon S.[2]
7-57-5
Polmans M.[11]
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-1
Janvier M.[13]
Mmoh M.[4]
7-55-76-4
King D.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[8]
4-66-26-3
Kubler J.[10]
Sela D.[5]
6-27-5
Lee D.[16]
Galarneau A.
6-37-5
R32
Sela D.[5]
Redlicki M.
6-26-1
Kwon S.[2]
Imai S.
6-26-3
King D.[12]
Draxl L.
3-67-56-2
Couacaud E.[15]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-3
Ilkel C.
Torpegaard M.[7]
6-44-66-2
Mmoh M.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Janvier M.[13]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-3
Uchiyama Y.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Mansouri S.
6-06-4
Neuchrist M.
Klein B.
6-47-5
Menezes J.
Harris A.
4-66-36-4
Polansky P.[3]
Uchida K.
5-76-26-1
Kubler J.[10]
Moriya H.
6-26-2
Lee D.[16]
Escobedo E.
6-44-67-64
Galarneau A.
Hoang A.[1]
6-33-67-64
R64
Galarneau A.
Barrios Vera T.
7-52-66-3
Gojo B.
Sigouin B.
5-76-36-2
Imai S.
Tabilo A.
6-42-67-5
Menezes J.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Santillan A.
3-66-36-1
Ilkel C.
Banes M.
6-36-2
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-17-61
Draxl L.
Arconada J.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.
Grills J.
6-766-16-0
Mansouri S.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Neuchrist M.
Li Z.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Petrovic D.
6-34-67-5
Moriya H.
Hoyt E.
6-16-4
Escobedo E.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3