Kimmer Coppejans vs Blaz Rola — Amersfoort CH Semi-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL2
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
SLO3
Blaz Rola
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
Coppejans K.
6-4 6-0
Rola B.
Coppejans K.
662
Rola B.
400

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Blaz Rola 6-4 6-0 in the Amersfoort CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Kimmer Coppejans extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayKimmer Coppejans6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rola B.

Rola B.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Rola B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
5.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 174). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Rola B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
81
Break points won·Clear edge
29
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
6
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Rola B.
Freshness·
76
—

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1