Kimmer Coppejans vs Dimitar Kuzmanov — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL2
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
Coppejans K.
6-3 1-6 6-1
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.
6162
Kuzmanov D.
3611

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-3 1-6 6-1 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Kuzmanov D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Kuzmanov D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Kuzmanov D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
67
61
Break points won·Even
29
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Kuzmanov D.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
57

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1