Kimmer Coppejans vs Jan Choinski — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL2
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Coppejans K.
7-6 6-4
Choinski J.
Coppejans K.
7762
Choinski J.
6540

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Jan Choinski 7-6 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
44
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
90
Break points won·Slight edge
29
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
88
Tiebreaks·Even
43
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Choinski J.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
55

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1