Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Renzo Olivo — Braunschweig CH Round of 64

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2019
clay
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-1 6-4
Olivo R.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Olivo R.
140

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Renzo Olivo 6-1 6-4 in the Braunschweig CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Olivo R.
33
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
8
Break points saved·Dominant
98
33
Break points won·Dominant
68
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Olivo R.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Kamke T.
7-666-1
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-56-0
Quarter-finals
Barranco Cosano J.
Kovalik J.
7-657-65
Kamke T.
Balazs A.
1-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[3]
Rosol L.[9]
7-646-746-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Ruud C.[1]
6-46-776-3
R16
Kamke T.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Monteiro T.[6]
Mager G.[11]
7-644-67-65
Balazs A.
Cachin P.
6-24-4
Ruud C.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-37-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Trungelliti M.[16]
6-26-4
Kovalik J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-16-3
Rosol L.[9]
Majchrzak K.[5]
4-66-46-1
Laaksonen H.[3]
Moraing M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Monteiro T.[6]
Diez S.
6-46-3
Altmaier D.
Otte O.[15]
6-31-0
Majchrzak K.[5]
Taberner C.
7-626-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-17-63
Ruud C.[1]
Hanfmann Y.
6-757-57-5
Rosol L.[9]
Griekspoor T.
7-52-66-3
Trungelliti M.[16]
Escobar G.
7-686-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ofner S.[10]
6-15-76-3
Kovalik J.
Martinez P.[8]
6-16-3
Kamke T.
Travaglia S.[4]
6-37-64
Haerteis J.
Molleker R.[13]
3-67-56-1
Cachin P.
Coppejans K.[12]
6-06-1
Balazs A.
Ymer E.[7]
6-36-2
Moraing M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-746-46-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-37-5
Mager G.[11]
Miedler L.
7-56-3
R64
Griekspoor T.
Muller A.
7-637-63
Barranco Cosano J.
Marterer M.
W/O
Hanfmann Y.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Olivo R.
6-16-4
Haerteis J.
Stebe C.
3-67-56-4
Cachin P.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-56-1
Escobar G.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Kovalik J.
Hassan B.
6-46-756-4
Kamke T.
Guttau N.
7-56-4
Balazs A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-16-1
Taberner C.
Heller P.
7-646-1
Moraing M.
Kuhn N.
6-32-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Masur D.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-43-66-2
Miedler L.
De Bakker T.
6-47-62
Altmaier D.
Maamoun K.
6-47-64