Lukas Rosol vs Tallon Griekspoor — Braunschweig CH Round of 32

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE9
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2019
clay
Tallon Griekspoor
NED
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
Rosol L.
7-5 2-6 6-3
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
7262
Griekspoor T.
5631

Lukas Rosol defeated Tallon Griekspoor 7-5 2-6 6-3 in the Braunschweig CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Griekspoor T.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rosol L.Griekspoor T.
—
Serve
19
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Griekspoor T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
8.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Griekspoor T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
99
Break points won·Dominant
3
34
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Griekspoor T.
Freshness·
—
96

Griekspoor T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Kamke T.
7-666-1
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-56-0
Quarter-finals
Barranco Cosano J.
Kovalik J.
7-657-65
Kamke T.
Balazs A.
1-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[3]
Rosol L.[9]
7-646-746-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Ruud C.[1]
6-46-776-3
R16
Kamke T.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Monteiro T.[6]
Mager G.[11]
7-644-67-65
Balazs A.
Cachin P.
6-24-4
Ruud C.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-37-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Trungelliti M.[16]
6-26-4
Kovalik J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-16-3
Rosol L.[9]
Majchrzak K.[5]
4-66-46-1
Laaksonen H.[3]
Moraing M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Monteiro T.[6]
Diez S.
6-46-3
Altmaier D.
Otte O.[15]
6-31-0
Majchrzak K.[5]
Taberner C.
7-626-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-17-63
Ruud C.[1]
Hanfmann Y.
6-757-57-5
Rosol L.[9]
Griekspoor T.
7-52-66-3
Trungelliti M.[16]
Escobar G.
7-686-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ofner S.[10]
6-15-76-3
Kovalik J.
Martinez P.[8]
6-16-3
Kamke T.
Travaglia S.[4]
6-37-64
Haerteis J.
Molleker R.[13]
3-67-56-1
Cachin P.
Coppejans K.[12]
6-06-1
Balazs A.
Ymer E.[7]
6-36-2
Moraing M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-746-46-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-37-5
Mager G.[11]
Miedler L.
7-56-3
R64
Griekspoor T.
Muller A.
7-637-63
Barranco Cosano J.
Marterer M.
W/O
Hanfmann Y.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Olivo R.
6-16-4
Haerteis J.
Stebe C.
3-67-56-4
Cachin P.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-56-1
Escobar G.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Kovalik J.
Hassan B.
6-46-756-4
Kamke T.
Guttau N.
7-56-4
Balazs A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-16-1
Taberner C.
Heller P.
7-646-1
Moraing M.
Kuhn N.
6-32-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Masur D.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-43-66-2
Miedler L.
De Bakker T.
6-47-62
Altmaier D.
Maamoun K.
6-47-64