Cem Ilkel vs Borna Gojo — Winnipeg CH Round of 64

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2019
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Ilkel C.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Gojo B.
Ilkel C.
6462
Gojo B.
4631

Cem Ilkel defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Winnipeg CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
53
Break points saved·Dominant
49
95
Break points won·Slight edge
3
10
Deciding sets·Even
70
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gombos N.[6]
Schnur B.[3]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Schnur B.[3]
Nguyen D.
6-27-5
Gombos N.[6]
Moriya H.[15]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Hoang A.[2]
7-654-66-3
Moriya H.[15]
Ilkel C.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Li Z.[13]
6-46-2
Schnur B.[3]
Cressy M.
6-27-5
R16
Li Z.[13]
Tomic B.[1]
1-67-676-4
Schnur B.[3]
Boulais J.
6-46-706-3
Cressy M.
King D.[9]
7-57-65
Hoang A.[2]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-0
Nguyen D.
Couacaud E.[11]
1-66-36-2
Ilkel C.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-696-3
Moriya H.[15]
Polansky P.[4]
6-45-77-61
Gombos N.[6]
Harris A.[12]
4-66-26-3
R32
Schnur B.[3]
Novikov D.
6-07-61
Nguyen D.
Soeda G.[7]
6-30-0
Cressy M.
Torpegaard M.[8]
6-716-36-0
King D.[9]
Klein B.
6-07-62
Catarina L.
Kylar K.
6-06-1
Tomic B.[1]
Muamba N.
6-46-2
Hoang A.[2]
Imai S.
7-657-5
Couacaud E.[11]
Matsui T.
6-36-2
Ortega Olmedo R.
Sela D.[5]
6-46-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.[10]
7-626-1
Polansky P.[4]
Lin J.
6-46-3
Gombos N.[6]
Sigouin B.
7-636-3
Li Z.[13]
Menezes J.
6-36-2
Boulais J.
Uchida K.[14]
3-66-36-3
Harris A.[12]
Ritschard A.
6-16-2
R64
Menezes J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Boulais J.
Okamura I.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Tabilo A.
6-17-64
Nguyen D.
Galarneau A.
1-66-17-5
Imai S.
Grills J.
6-767-606-0
Matsui T.
Lebedev A.
7-646-4
Novikov D.
Peck J.
6-47-63
Klein B.
Saraiva B.
6-16-2
Ortega Olmedo R.
Song E.
6-16-4
Ilkel C.
Gojo B.
6-44-66-3
Sigouin B.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-23-66-3
Ritschard A.
Garanganga T.
6-46-4
Muamba N.
Hach Verdugo H.
6-47-5