Steven Diez vs Alexey Vatutin — Braunschweig CH Round of 64

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
CAN
Steven Diez
#1565ATP
35 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2019
clay
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1374Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Diez S.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Vatutin A.
Diez S.
6362
Vatutin A.
4621

Steven Diez defeated Alexey Vatutin 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Braunschweig CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alexey Vatutin came in ranked #610, defending last year's round of 32. Steven Diez extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Steven Diez closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ1hardSteven Diez6-3 4-6 6-4
2017-05-01IstanbulQ1clayAlexey Vatutin7-6(2) 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Diez S.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Diez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diez S.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diez S.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Even
4
0
Break points saved·Dominant
48
18
Break points won·Even
31
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
3
10
Tiebreaks·Even
8
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Kamke T.
7-666-1
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-56-0
Quarter-finals
Barranco Cosano J.
Kovalik J.
7-657-65
Kamke T.
Balazs A.
1-66-46-4
Laaksonen H.[3]
Rosol L.[9]
7-646-746-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Ruud C.[1]
6-46-776-3
R16
Kamke T.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Monteiro T.[6]
Mager G.[11]
7-644-67-65
Balazs A.
Cachin P.
6-24-4
Ruud C.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-37-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Trungelliti M.[16]
6-26-4
Kovalik J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-16-3
Rosol L.[9]
Majchrzak K.[5]
4-66-46-1
Laaksonen H.[3]
Moraing M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Monteiro T.[6]
Diez S.
6-46-3
Altmaier D.
Otte O.[15]
6-31-0
Majchrzak K.[5]
Taberner C.
7-626-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-17-63
Ruud C.[1]
Hanfmann Y.
6-757-57-5
Rosol L.[9]
Griekspoor T.
7-52-66-3
Trungelliti M.[16]
Escobar G.
7-686-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ofner S.[10]
6-15-76-3
Kovalik J.
Martinez P.[8]
6-16-3
Kamke T.
Travaglia S.[4]
6-37-64
Haerteis J.
Molleker R.[13]
3-67-56-1
Cachin P.
Coppejans K.[12]
6-06-1
Balazs A.
Ymer E.[7]
6-36-2
Moraing M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-746-46-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-37-5
Mager G.[11]
Miedler L.
7-56-3
R64
Griekspoor T.
Muller A.
7-637-63
Barranco Cosano J.
Marterer M.
W/O
Hanfmann Y.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Olivo R.
6-16-4
Haerteis J.
Stebe C.
3-67-56-4
Cachin P.
Van Rijthoven T.
7-56-1
Escobar G.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Kovalik J.
Hassan B.
6-46-756-4
Kamke T.
Guttau N.
7-56-4
Balazs A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-16-1
Taberner C.
Heller P.
7-646-1
Moraing M.
Kuhn N.
6-32-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Masur D.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-43-66-2
Miedler L.
De Bakker T.
6-47-62
Altmaier D.
Maamoun K.
6-47-64