Maxime Cressy vs Alejandro Tabilo — Winnipeg CH Round of 64

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 July 2019
hard
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1750Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Cressy M.
6-1 7-6
Tabilo A.
Cressy M.
6772
Tabilo A.
1640

Maxime Cressy defeated Alejandro Tabilo 6-1 7-6 in the Winnipeg CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alejandro Tabilo came in ranked #31, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Maxime Cressy claimed a first win over Alejandro Tabilo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR64hardAlejandro Tabilo7-6(3) 7-6(13)

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Tabilo A.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cressy M.Tabilo A.
—
Serve
51
—
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Tabilo A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
68%
66%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.1
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Tabilo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
74
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Dominant
2
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cressy M.Tabilo A.
Freshness·
—
98

Tabilo A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gombos N.[6]
Schnur B.[3]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Schnur B.[3]
Nguyen D.
6-27-5
Gombos N.[6]
Moriya H.[15]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nguyen D.
Hoang A.[2]
7-654-66-3
Moriya H.[15]
Ilkel C.
6-46-2
Gombos N.[6]
Li Z.[13]
6-46-2
Schnur B.[3]
Cressy M.
6-27-5
R16
Li Z.[13]
Tomic B.[1]
1-67-676-4
Schnur B.[3]
Boulais J.
6-46-706-3
Cressy M.
King D.[9]
7-57-65
Hoang A.[2]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-0
Nguyen D.
Couacaud E.[11]
1-66-36-2
Ilkel C.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-696-3
Moriya H.[15]
Polansky P.[4]
6-45-77-61
Gombos N.[6]
Harris A.[12]
4-66-26-3
R32
Schnur B.[3]
Novikov D.
6-07-61
Nguyen D.
Soeda G.[7]
6-30-0
Cressy M.
Torpegaard M.[8]
6-716-36-0
King D.[9]
Klein B.
6-07-62
Catarina L.
Kylar K.
6-06-1
Tomic B.[1]
Muamba N.
6-46-2
Hoang A.[2]
Imai S.
7-657-5
Couacaud E.[11]
Matsui T.
6-36-2
Ortega Olmedo R.
Sela D.[5]
6-46-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.[10]
7-626-1
Polansky P.[4]
Lin J.
6-46-3
Gombos N.[6]
Sigouin B.
7-636-3
Li Z.[13]
Menezes J.
6-36-2
Boulais J.
Uchida K.[14]
3-66-36-3
Harris A.[12]
Ritschard A.
6-16-2
R64
Menezes J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Boulais J.
Okamura I.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Tabilo A.
6-17-64
Nguyen D.
Galarneau A.
1-66-17-5
Imai S.
Grills J.
6-767-606-0
Matsui T.
Lebedev A.
7-646-4
Novikov D.
Peck J.
6-47-63
Klein B.
Saraiva B.
6-16-2
Ortega Olmedo R.
Song E.
6-16-4
Ilkel C.
Gojo B.
6-44-66-3
Sigouin B.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-23-66-3
Ritschard A.
Garanganga T.
6-46-4
Muamba N.
Hach Verdugo H.
6-47-5