Daniel Masur vs Marco Trungelliti — Ludwigshafen CH Round of 64

Ludwigshafen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1387Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2019
clay
Marco Trungelliti
ARG10
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
Masur D.
5-7 7-5 6-4
Trungelliti M.
Masur D.
5762
Trungelliti M.
7541

Daniel Masur defeated Marco Trungelliti 5-7 7-5 6-4 in the Ludwigshafen CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
87
Break points won·Clear edge
5
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
87
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
13
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·Even
99
95

Masur D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Trungelliti M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.
Horansky F.[12]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.
Travaglia S.[2]
4-66-36-3
Horansky F.[12]
Molcan A.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-57-64
Hanfmann Y.
Ymer E.[4]
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Bagnis F.[9]
6-46-3
Horansky F.[12]
Lestienne C.[16]
6-43-67-5
R16
Hanfmann Y.
Mager G.[6]
6-16-2
Horansky F.[12]
Otte O.[8]
6-721-0
Lestienne C.[16]
Laaksonen H.[1]
7-617-66
Zapata Miralles B.
Brown D.[7]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[2]
Gimeno Traver D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.[4]
Galan D.[15]
6-46-4
Bagnis F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-16-3
Molcan A.
Hassan B.
6-36-2
R32
Otte O.[8]
Metreveli A.
6-36-3
Horansky F.[12]
Altmaier D.
6-27-5
Brown D.[7]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Galan D.[15]
Heller P.
6-37-65
Travaglia S.[2]
Giraldo S.
6-17-66
Gimeno Traver D.
Dutra Silva R.
3-67-656-0
Hanfmann Y.
Haerteis J.
6-36-3
Mager G.[6]
Cachin P.
6-35-76-1
Martin A.[5]
Kuhn N.
7-54-66-3
Bagnis F.[9]
Piros Z.
6-44-66-1
Molcan A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-26-4
Hassan B.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-2
Lestienne C.[16]
De Bakker T.
6-36-4
Laaksonen H.[1]
Miedler L.
6-47-64
Zapata Miralles B.
Masur D.
0-66-16-0
Ymer E.[4]
Moroni G.
6-46-4
R64
Giraldo S.
Bonzi B.
6-756-33-0
Hassan B.
Robert S.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Quinzi G.
3-67-656-3
Lestienne C.[16]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
Lenz J.
3-67-637-64
Galan D.[15]
Heyman C.
6-16-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Gengel M.
6-46-4
Dutra Silva R.
Nedovyesov A.[14]
4-66-37-65
Moroni G.
Clezar G.
6-33-67-5
Heller P.
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Hanfmann Y.
Domingues J.[11]
6-33-66-1
Cachin P.
Griekspoor S.
6-36-3
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[9]
Grigelis L.
6-46-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Berlocq C.[13]
6-36-747-5
Molcan A.
Schneider V.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Olivo R.
7-57-64
Horansky F.[12]
Bonadio R.
5-76-37-5
De Bakker T.
Ehrat S.
6-46-4
Masur D.
Trungelliti M.[10]
5-77-56-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Muller A.
5-76-26-4
Fanselow S.
Vatutin A.
5-76-27-67
Altmaier D.
Choinski J.
6-47-64
Miedler L.
Kamke T.
6-46-4