Elias Ymer vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Ludwigshafen CH Round of 16

Ludwigshafen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Elias Ymer
SWE4
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 July 2019
clay
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL15
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
Ymer E.
6-4 6-4
Galan D.
Ymer E.
662
Galan D.
440

Elias Ymer defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-4 6-4 in the Ludwigshafen CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Elias Ymer edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.7
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Even
48
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
92
Break points won·Even
23
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Galan D.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.
Horansky F.[12]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.
Travaglia S.[2]
4-66-36-3
Horansky F.[12]
Molcan A.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-57-64
Hanfmann Y.
Ymer E.[4]
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Bagnis F.[9]
6-46-3
Horansky F.[12]
Lestienne C.[16]
6-43-67-5
R16
Hanfmann Y.
Mager G.[6]
6-16-2
Horansky F.[12]
Otte O.[8]
6-721-0
Lestienne C.[16]
Laaksonen H.[1]
7-617-66
Zapata Miralles B.
Brown D.[7]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[2]
Gimeno Traver D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.[4]
Galan D.[15]
6-46-4
Bagnis F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-16-3
Molcan A.
Hassan B.
6-36-2
R32
Otte O.[8]
Metreveli A.
6-36-3
Horansky F.[12]
Altmaier D.
6-27-5
Brown D.[7]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Galan D.[15]
Heller P.
6-37-65
Travaglia S.[2]
Giraldo S.
6-17-66
Gimeno Traver D.
Dutra Silva R.
3-67-656-0
Hanfmann Y.
Haerteis J.
6-36-3
Mager G.[6]
Cachin P.
6-35-76-1
Martin A.[5]
Kuhn N.
7-54-66-3
Bagnis F.[9]
Piros Z.
6-44-66-1
Molcan A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-26-4
Hassan B.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-2
Lestienne C.[16]
De Bakker T.
6-36-4
Laaksonen H.[1]
Miedler L.
6-47-64
Zapata Miralles B.
Masur D.
0-66-16-0
Ymer E.[4]
Moroni G.
6-46-4
R64
Giraldo S.
Bonzi B.
6-756-33-0
Hassan B.
Robert S.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Quinzi G.
3-67-656-3
Lestienne C.[16]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
Lenz J.
3-67-637-64
Galan D.[15]
Heyman C.
6-16-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Gengel M.
6-46-4
Dutra Silva R.
Nedovyesov A.[14]
4-66-37-65
Moroni G.
Clezar G.
6-33-67-5
Heller P.
Denolly C.
6-26-3
Hanfmann Y.
Domingues J.[11]
6-33-66-1
Cachin P.
Griekspoor S.
6-36-3
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[9]
Grigelis L.
6-46-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Berlocq C.[13]
6-36-747-5
Molcan A.
Schneider V.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Olivo R.
7-57-64
Horansky F.[12]
Bonadio R.
5-76-37-5
De Bakker T.
Ehrat S.
6-46-4
Masur D.
Trungelliti M.[10]
5-77-56-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Muller A.
5-76-26-4
Fanselow S.
Vatutin A.
5-76-27-67
Altmaier D.
Choinski J.
6-47-64
Miedler L.
Kamke T.
6-46-4