Danilo Petrovic vs Sumit Nagal — Milan CH Semi-final

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
SRB
Danilo Petrovic
34 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Petrovic D.
7-5 6-2
Nagal S.
Petrovic D.
762
Nagal S.
520

Danilo Petrovic defeated Sumit Nagal 7-5 6-2 in the Milan CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Petrovic D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Petrovic D.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Petrovic D.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Petrovic D.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
69
Break points won·Clear edge
18
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
5
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Petrovic D.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[1]
Petrovic D.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Petrovic D.
Nagal S.[8]
7-56-2
Dellien H.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Karatsev A.
6-47-64
Musetti L.
Arevalo M.
7-646-2
Dellien H.[1]
Robredo T.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Nagal S.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-32-1
Musetti L.
Hernandez J.[16]
7-53-0
Karatsev A.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Sousa P.[4]
6-16-2
Petrovic D.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-5
Arevalo M.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Robredo T.[6]
Balzerani R.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-746-3
R32
Olivo R.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Daniel T.[3]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Moroni G.[15]
7-56-1
Cuevas M.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
6-32-66-4
Sousa P.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-37-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Peliwo F.[14]
6-26-3
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Lee D.[5]
6-26-2
Muller A.
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-36-2
Arevalo M.
Banes M.[11]
6-16-4
Hernandez J.[16]
Forti F.
6-46-2
Robredo T.[6]
Molcan A.
6-46-1
Balzerani R.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-47-5
R64
Grigelis L.
Tatlot J.
5-74-1
Serdarusic N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Fanselow S.
Heyman C.
7-57-65
Karatsev A.
King E.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Ocleppo J.
Brancaccio R.
6-13-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Collarini A.
6-20-66-4
Petrovic D.
Sels J.
4-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Musetti L.
Kotov P.
7-626-3
Molcan A.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Gojo B.
4-66-06-2
Forti F.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Robert S.
6-03-66-2