Sumit Nagal vs Aslan Karatsev — Milan CH Quarter-final

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
clay
RUS
Aslan Karatsev
#1285ATP
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLLL
Nagal S.
6-4 7-6
Karatsev A.
Nagal S.
6772
Karatsev A.
4640

Sumit Nagal defeated Aslan Karatsev 6-4 7-6 in the Milan CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Karatsev A.

Karatsev A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Karatsev A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Karatsev A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
43
Break points saved·Dominant
69
94
Break points won·Even
35
39
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
37
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Karatsev A.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[1]
Petrovic D.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Petrovic D.
Nagal S.[8]
7-56-2
Dellien H.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Karatsev A.
6-47-64
Musetti L.
Arevalo M.
7-646-2
Dellien H.[1]
Robredo T.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Nagal S.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-32-1
Musetti L.
Hernandez J.[16]
7-53-0
Karatsev A.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Sousa P.[4]
6-16-2
Petrovic D.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-5
Arevalo M.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Robredo T.[6]
Balzerani R.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-746-3
R32
Olivo R.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Daniel T.[3]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Moroni G.[15]
7-56-1
Cuevas M.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
6-32-66-4
Sousa P.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-37-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Peliwo F.[14]
6-26-3
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Lee D.[5]
6-26-2
Muller A.
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-36-2
Arevalo M.
Banes M.[11]
6-16-4
Hernandez J.[16]
Forti F.
6-46-2
Robredo T.[6]
Molcan A.
6-46-1
Balzerani R.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-47-5
R64
Grigelis L.
Tatlot J.
5-74-1
Serdarusic N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Fanselow S.
Heyman C.
7-57-65
Karatsev A.
King E.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Ocleppo J.
Brancaccio R.
6-13-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Collarini A.
6-20-66-4
Petrovic D.
Sels J.
4-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Musetti L.
Kotov P.
7-626-3
Molcan A.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Gojo B.
4-66-06-2
Forti F.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Robert S.
6-03-66-2