Sumit Nagal vs Laurynas Grigelis — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
clay
LTU
Laurynas Grigelis
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWWL
Nagal S.
6-2 6-3
Grigelis L.
Nagal S.
662
Grigelis L.
230

Sumit Nagal defeated Laurynas Grigelis 6-2 6-3 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Grigelis L.

Grigelis L.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Grigelis L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Grigelis L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
16
Break points saved·Dominant
69
41
Break points won·Clear edge
35
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Grigelis L.
Freshness·
92
—

Nagal S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[1]
Petrovic D.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Petrovic D.
Nagal S.[8]
7-56-2
Dellien H.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Karatsev A.
6-47-64
Musetti L.
Arevalo M.
7-646-2
Dellien H.[1]
Robredo T.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Nagal S.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-32-1
Musetti L.
Hernandez J.[16]
7-53-0
Karatsev A.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Sousa P.[4]
6-16-2
Petrovic D.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-5
Arevalo M.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Robredo T.[6]
Balzerani R.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-746-3
R32
Olivo R.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Daniel T.[3]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Moroni G.[15]
7-56-1
Cuevas M.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
6-32-66-4
Sousa P.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-37-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Peliwo F.[14]
6-26-3
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Lee D.[5]
6-26-2
Muller A.
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-36-2
Arevalo M.
Banes M.[11]
6-16-4
Hernandez J.[16]
Forti F.
6-46-2
Robredo T.[6]
Molcan A.
6-46-1
Balzerani R.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-47-5
R64
Grigelis L.
Tatlot J.
5-74-1
Serdarusic N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Fanselow S.
Heyman C.
7-57-65
Karatsev A.
King E.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Ocleppo J.
Brancaccio R.
6-13-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Collarini A.
6-20-66-4
Petrovic D.
Sels J.
4-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Musetti L.
Kotov P.
7-626-3
Molcan A.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Gojo B.
4-66-06-2
Forti F.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Robert S.
6-03-66-2