Kyle Edmund vs Daniel Evans — Eastbourne Quarter-final

Eastbourne · ATP · Quarter-final
GBR3
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
grass
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#385ATP
1588ELO
1584Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Edmund K.
1-6 6-3 6-4
Evans D.
Edmund K.
1662
Evans D.
6341

Kyle Edmund defeated Daniel Evans 1-6 6-3 6-4 in the Eastbourne quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Kyle Edmund came in defending last year's quarter-final. Kyle Edmund extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonR32hardDaniel Evans6-1 6-2
2017-04-17Monte Carlo MastersR64clayKyle Edmund7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Dominant
22
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Edmund K.Evans D.
Freshness·
—
100

Evans D.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.
Querrey S.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Querrey S.
Fabbiano T.
6-36-746-3
Fritz T.
Edmund K.[3]
7-686-3
Quarter-finals
Fabbiano T.
Simon G.[6]
6-46-3
Fritz T.
Hurkacz H.
6-47-65
Edmund K.[3]
Evans D.
1-66-36-4
Querrey S.
Verdasco F.[5]
7-646-2
R16
Fabbiano T.
Djere L.[2]
7-657-66
Fritz T.
Pella G.[1]
6-43-66-4
Querrey S.
Lajovic D.[4]
6-26-3
Edmund K.[3]
Norrie C.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Johnson S.
6-37-66
Evans D.
Herbert P.
6-37-5
Verdasco F.[5]
Londero J.
6-746-37-62
Simon G.[6]
Jarry N.
6-26-4
R32
Hurkacz H.
Cecchinato M.[7]
6-46-4
Norrie C.
Chardy J.
6-37-64
Londero J.
Clarke J.
6-756-16-3
Querrey S.
Kukushkin M.
6-37-64
Johnson S.
Opelka R.
7-646-3
Evans D.
Albot R.[8]
7-626-2
Herbert P.
Kudla D.
5-77-686-4
Fritz T.
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Jarry N.
Cuevas P.
6-17-64
Simon G.[6]
Sandgren T.
7-56-1
Fabbiano T.
Ward J.
2-66-36-1
Verdasco F.[5]
Millman J.
6-736-46-1