Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Corentin Denolly — Milan CH Round of 64

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
clay
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#439ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Kuzmanov D.
6-3 6-4
Denolly C.
Kuzmanov D.
662
Denolly C.
340

Dimitar Kuzmanov defeated Corentin Denolly 6-3 6-4 in the Milan CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kuzmanov D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Denolly C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kuzmanov D.Denolly C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuzmanov D.Denolly C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
72
Break points won·Clear edge
31
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kuzmanov D.Denolly C.
Freshness·
57
—

Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[1]
Petrovic D.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Petrovic D.
Nagal S.[8]
7-56-2
Dellien H.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Karatsev A.
6-47-64
Musetti L.
Arevalo M.
7-646-2
Dellien H.[1]
Robredo T.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Nagal S.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-32-1
Musetti L.
Hernandez J.[16]
7-53-0
Karatsev A.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Sousa P.[4]
6-16-2
Petrovic D.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-5
Arevalo M.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Robredo T.[6]
Balzerani R.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-746-3
R32
Olivo R.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Daniel T.[3]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Moroni G.[15]
7-56-1
Cuevas M.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
6-32-66-4
Sousa P.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-37-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Peliwo F.[14]
6-26-3
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Lee D.[5]
6-26-2
Muller A.
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-36-2
Arevalo M.
Banes M.[11]
6-16-4
Hernandez J.[16]
Forti F.
6-46-2
Robredo T.[6]
Molcan A.
6-46-1
Balzerani R.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-47-5
R64
Grigelis L.
Tatlot J.
5-74-1
Serdarusic N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Fanselow S.
Heyman C.
7-57-65
Karatsev A.
King E.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Ocleppo J.
Brancaccio R.
6-13-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Collarini A.
6-20-66-4
Petrovic D.
Sels J.
4-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Musetti L.
Kotov P.
7-626-3
Molcan A.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Gojo B.
4-66-06-2
Forti F.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Robert S.
6-03-66-2