Riccardo Bonadio vs Borna Gojo — Milan CH Round of 64

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 June 2019
clay
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Bonadio R.
4-6 6-0 6-2
Gojo B.
Bonadio R.
4662
Gojo B.
6021

Riccardo Bonadio defeated Borna Gojo 4-6 6-0 6-2 in the Milan CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bonadio R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bonadio R.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
10.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bonadio R.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
53
Break points saved·Dominant
70
95
Break points won·Slight edge
19
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bonadio R.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[1]
Petrovic D.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Petrovic D.
Nagal S.[8]
7-56-2
Dellien H.[1]
Musetti L.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Karatsev A.
6-47-64
Musetti L.
Arevalo M.
7-646-2
Dellien H.[1]
Robredo T.[6]
6-26-3
R16
Nagal S.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-32-1
Musetti L.
Hernandez J.[16]
7-53-0
Karatsev A.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Sousa P.[4]
6-16-2
Petrovic D.
Serdarusic N.
6-37-5
Arevalo M.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Robredo T.[6]
Balzerani R.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Olivo R.
6-26-746-3
R32
Olivo R.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Daniel T.[3]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Moroni G.[15]
7-56-1
Cuevas M.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
6-32-66-4
Sousa P.[4]
Ocleppo J.
6-37-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Peliwo F.[14]
6-26-3
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Lee D.[5]
6-26-2
Muller A.
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-36-2
Arevalo M.
Banes M.[11]
6-16-4
Hernandez J.[16]
Forti F.
6-46-2
Robredo T.[6]
Molcan A.
6-46-1
Balzerani R.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-26-3
Dellien H.[1]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-47-5
R64
Grigelis L.
Tatlot J.
5-74-1
Serdarusic N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Fanselow S.
Heyman C.
7-57-65
Karatsev A.
King E.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Ocleppo J.
Brancaccio R.
6-13-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Collarini A.
6-20-66-4
Petrovic D.
Sels J.
4-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Musetti L.
Kotov P.
7-626-3
Molcan A.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Olivo R.
Cid R.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Gojo B.
4-66-06-2
Forti F.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Robert S.
6-03-66-2