Lukas Lacko vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Ilkley CH Round of 64

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Lacko L.
6-3 6-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Lacko L.
662
Menendez Maceiras A.
340

Lukas Lacko defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-3 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 64 on grass. The result followed the form book — Lukas Lacko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lukas Lacko extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Lacko closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-02-24DubaiQ1hardLukas Lacko6-4 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Menendez Maceiras A.

Menendez Maceiras A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
21
Break points saved·Dominant
86
54
Break points won·Even
8
6
Deciding sets·Even
33
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4