Dennis Novak vs Jason Kubler — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT9
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1679Grass ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Novak D.
7-6 6-3
Kubler J.
Novak D.
7762
Kubler J.
6530

Dennis Novak defeated Jason Kubler 7-6 6-3 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jason Kubler came in ranked #468, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Dennis Novak claimed a first win over Jason Kubler in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Dennis Novak closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-27WimbledonR64grassJason Kubler6-3 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
90
Break points won·Dominant
15
46
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4