Lukas Rosol vs Denis Istomin — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
UZB4
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Rosol L.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Istomin D.
Rosol L.
6462
Istomin D.
3641

Lukas Rosol defeated Denis Istomin 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Lukas Rosol extended the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

3–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-04-25MunichR32clayLukas Rosol6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(2)
2015-09-28ShenzhenR32hardLukas Rosol7-6(4) 6-4
2012-10-15MoscowR16hardLukas Rosol4-6 6-4 6-3
2010-07-19HamburgR64clayDenis Istomin3-6 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Istomin D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Istomin D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
29
Break points saved·Even
89
90
Break points won·Even
3
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4