Dominik Koepfer vs Ugo Humbert — Ilkley CH Quarter-final

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
Ugo Humbert
FRA2
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1769Grass ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Koepfer D.
6-4 6-3
Humbert U.
Koepfer D.
662
Humbert U.
430

Dominik Koepfer defeated Ugo Humbert 6-4 6-3 in the Ilkley CH quarter-final on grass. Dominik Koepfer extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-20LyonR16clayDominik Koepfer2-6 6-4 6-4
2024-03-18Miami MastersR32hardDominik Koepfer3-6 6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Even
71
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
99
Break points won·Slight edge
28
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
78
Tiebreaks·Even
87
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Koepfer D.Humbert U.
Freshness·
—
95

Humbert U.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4