Antoine Hoang vs Lukas Lacko — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA13
Antoine Hoang
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Hoang A.
6-3 7-5
Lacko L.
Hoang A.
672
Lacko L.
350

Antoine Hoang defeated Lukas Lacko 6-3 7-5 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Antoine Hoang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Antoine Hoang extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Antoine Hoang closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-31MontpellierQ1hardAntoine Hoang7-6(6) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hoang A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Hoang A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hoang A.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 133). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hoang A.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
18
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
86
Break points won·Slight edge
15
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
40
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4