Tommy Robredo vs Federico Gaio — Parma CH Final

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Final
ESP8
Tommy Robredo
44 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
clay
ITA6
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Robredo T.
7-6 5-7 7-6
Gaio F.
Robredo T.
7125782
Gaio F.
6107661

Tommy Robredo defeated Federico Gaio 7-6 5-7 7-6 in the Parma CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Gaio came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tommy Robredo claimed a first win over Federico Gaio in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-19BarcelonaQ1clayFederico Gaio7-6(3) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Robredo T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Robredo T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Robredo T.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Robredo T.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
20
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
76
Break points won·Clear edge
26
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
40
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Robredo T.[8]
Gaio F.[6]
7-6105-77-66
Semi-finals
Robredo T.[8]
Lenz J.
5-0
Gaio F.[6]
Zeppieri G.
6-43-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gaio F.[6]
Travaglia S.[4]
6-43-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Cuevas M.
6-757-626-1
Lenz J.
Berrettini J.
6-16-3
Robredo T.[8]
Collarini A.
6-47-63
R16
Zeppieri G.
Fatic N.
6-16-2
Cuevas M.
Banes M.[10]
6-46-0
Travaglia S.[4]
Pellegrino A.
3-66-26-0
Gaio F.[6]
Quinzi G.[9]
6-36-4
Lenz J.
Peliwo F.[12]
6-36-1
Berrettini J.
Grills J.
6-16-4
Robredo T.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-3
Collarini A.
Vavassori A.
6-27-5
R32
Peliwo F.[12]
Di Nicola G.
6-36-3
Robredo T.[8]
Ehrat S.
7-56-3
Fatic N.
Robert S.[13]
6-26-3
Zeppieri G.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-31-66-4
Banes M.[10]
Basso A.
6-17-63
Cuevas M.
Arnaboldi A.[7]
6-747-646-4
Travaglia S.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Clezar G.[14]
5-77-656-4
Quinzi G.[9]
Bortolotti M.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[6]
Bega A.
6-46-756-4
Lenz J.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-16-4
Berrettini J.
Petrovic D.[15]
6-47-5
Grills J.
Daniel T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Gimeno Traver D.[11]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Grigelis L.[16]
6-36-3
Vavassori A.
Dellien H.[1]
6-16-1
R64
Vavassori A.
Virgili A.
7-677-65
Zeppieri G.
Dalla Valle E.
6-40-0
Fatic N.
Franco Descotte M.
6-35-2
Ehrat S.
Haerteis J.
6-22-1
Lenz J.
Bonadio R.
7-616-2
Basso A.
Forti F.
6-15-76-3
Cuevas M.
Satral J.
6-37-61
Kuzmanov D.
Avidzba A.
6-44-66-2
Pellegrino A.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-0
Bortolotti M.
Maggioli E.
6-12-66-2
Bega A.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Di Nicola G.
Escoffier A.
7-56-2
Berrettini J.
Musetti L.
6-47-5
Grills J.
Heyman C.
7-636-1
Brancaccio R.
Ornago F.
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-36-0