Marius Copil vs Mitchell Krueger — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU3
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
grass
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1424Grass ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Copil M.
7-6 7-6
Krueger M.
Copil M.
77772
Krueger M.
65640

Marius Copil defeated Mitchell Krueger 7-6 7-6 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
16
Break points saved·Even
91
87
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Copil M.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
100

Krueger M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Koepfer D.
Novak D.[9]
3-66-37-65
Semi-finals
Novak D.[9]
Majchrzak K.[10]
6-717-636-3
Koepfer D.
Soeda G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[10]
Hoang A.[13]
6-35-76-4
Koepfer D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-46-3
Soeda G.
Granollers M.[6]
7-56-4
Novak D.[9]
Rosol L.
6-796-36-4
R16
Majchrzak K.[10]
Vesely J.[7]
6-36-3
Soeda G.
Copil M.[3]
7-656-3
Rosol L.
Ymer M.[15]
6-37-64
Humbert U.[2]
Kwon S.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.
Jung J.[12]
7-666-4
Granollers M.[6]
Barrere G.[11]
6-23-67-5
Hoang A.[13]
Bemelmans R.
6-16-1
Novak D.[9]
Jubb P.
6-36-2
R32
Copil M.[3]
Krueger M.
7-657-64
Jung J.[12]
Bolt A.
7-626-1
Barrere G.[11]
Duckworth J.
7-636-3
Koepfer D.
Maden Y.[5]
6-26-4
Granollers M.[6]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Humbert U.[2]
Napolitano S.
4-66-46-0
Kwon S.
Mager G.[16]
4-66-26-0
Soeda G.
Caruso S.[14]
0-66-16-4
Jubb P.
Monteiro T.[8]
4-66-36-2
Novak D.[9]
Kubler J.
7-656-3
Ymer M.[15]
Klein B.
6-36-1
Rosol L.
Istomin D.[4]
6-34-66-4
Vesely J.[7]
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Majchrzak K.[10]
Sugita Y.
7-616-3
Hoang A.[13]
Lacko L.
6-37-5
Bemelmans R.
Karlovskiy E.
6-46-1
R64
Bemelmans R.
Ito T.
6-746-36-4
Soeda G.
Galovic V.
7-647-68
Kubler J.
Otte O.
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.
Peniston R.
7-56-4
Napolitano S.
Broady L.
7-656-2
Kwon S.
Hoyt E.
6-06-4
Bolt A.
Donskoy E.
6-37-611
Koepfer D.
Polmans M.
7-616-3
Krueger M.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Duckworth J.
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Giron M.
Baldi F.
6-16-4
Jubb P.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-2
Klein B.
Choinski J.
2-67-56-2
Rosol L.
Ofner S.
6-786-37-62
Sugita Y.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-17-65
Lacko L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4