Jacopo Berrettini vs Lorenzo Musetti — Parma CH Round of 64

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Jacopo Berrettini
#546ATP
1325ELO
1336Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2019
clay
Lorenzo Musetti
ITA
Lorenzo Musetti
#14ATP
1869ELO
1853Clay ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
Berrettini J.
6-4 7-5
Musetti L.
Berrettini J.
672
Musetti L.
450

Jacopo Berrettini defeated Lorenzo Musetti 6-4 7-5 in the Parma CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lorenzo Musetti came in ranked #14.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Berrettini J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Musetti L.

Musetti L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Berrettini J.

Serve advantage — Musetti L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Berrettini J.Musetti L.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Berrettini J.Musetti L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Berrettini J.Musetti L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
2
89
Break points saved·Dominant
23
98
Break points won·Dominant
17
82
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Robredo T.[8]
Gaio F.[6]
7-6105-77-66
Semi-finals
Robredo T.[8]
Lenz J.
5-0
Gaio F.[6]
Zeppieri G.
6-43-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gaio F.[6]
Travaglia S.[4]
6-43-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Cuevas M.
6-757-626-1
Lenz J.
Berrettini J.
6-16-3
Robredo T.[8]
Collarini A.
6-47-63
R16
Zeppieri G.
Fatic N.
6-16-2
Cuevas M.
Banes M.[10]
6-46-0
Travaglia S.[4]
Pellegrino A.
3-66-26-0
Gaio F.[6]
Quinzi G.[9]
6-36-4
Lenz J.
Peliwo F.[12]
6-36-1
Berrettini J.
Grills J.
6-16-4
Robredo T.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-3
Collarini A.
Vavassori A.
6-27-5
R32
Peliwo F.[12]
Di Nicola G.
6-36-3
Robredo T.[8]
Ehrat S.
7-56-3
Fatic N.
Robert S.[13]
6-26-3
Zeppieri G.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-31-66-4
Banes M.[10]
Basso A.
6-17-63
Cuevas M.
Arnaboldi A.[7]
6-747-646-4
Travaglia S.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Clezar G.[14]
5-77-656-4
Quinzi G.[9]
Bortolotti M.
6-16-3
Gaio F.[6]
Bega A.
6-46-756-4
Lenz J.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-16-4
Berrettini J.
Petrovic D.[15]
6-47-5
Grills J.
Daniel T.[3]
4-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Gimeno Traver D.[11]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Grigelis L.[16]
6-36-3
Vavassori A.
Dellien H.[1]
6-16-1
R64
Vavassori A.
Virgili A.
7-677-65
Zeppieri G.
Dalla Valle E.
6-40-0
Fatic N.
Franco Descotte M.
6-35-2
Ehrat S.
Haerteis J.
6-22-1
Lenz J.
Bonadio R.
7-616-2
Basso A.
Forti F.
6-15-76-3
Cuevas M.
Satral J.
6-37-61
Kuzmanov D.
Avidzba A.
6-44-66-2
Pellegrino A.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-0
Bortolotti M.
Maggioli E.
6-12-66-2
Bega A.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Di Nicola G.
Escoffier A.
7-56-2
Berrettini J.
Musetti L.
6-47-5
Grills J.
Heyman C.
7-636-1
Brancaccio R.
Ornago F.
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-36-0