Daniel Evans vs Jack Draper — Nottingham CH Round of 32

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Evans
GBR1
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1584Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2019
grass
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1704Grass ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Evans D.
7-5 6-3
Draper J.
Evans D.
762
Draper J.
530

Daniel Evans defeated Jack Draper 7-5 6-3 in the Nottingham CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Daniel Evans claimed a first win over Jack Draper in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR64hardJack Draper6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
73
88
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Clear edge
61
83
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Draper J.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Evans D.: 19 days rest · Draper J.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Donskoy E.[13]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Donskoy E.[13]
Hoang A.[14]
6-36-2
Evans D.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.
Rosol L.[16]
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Koepfer D.
7-666-766-4
Hoang A.[14]
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[13]
Novak D.[5]
6-7157-57-66
R16
Koepfer D.
Ofner S.[10]
6-22-0
Evans D.[1]
Ymer M.[15]
6-22-67-5
Rosol L.[16]
Ito T.
6-46-706-3
Hoang A.[14]
Peniston R.
7-636-2
Bemelmans R.
Maden Y.[6]
4-66-36-4
Donskoy E.[13]
Karlovic I.[3]
6-36-777-66
Novak D.[5]
Kwon S.[9]
7-646-3
Soeda G.
Duckworth J.
7-646-2
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.[2]
7-621-0
Donskoy E.[13]
Escobedo E.
7-56-4
Hoang A.[14]
Kamke T.
5-76-46-2
Karlovic I.[3]
Napolitano S.
7-644-66-3
Koepfer D.
Majchrzak K.[7]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[16]
Smith J.
6-16-746-3
Maden Y.[6]
Sugita Y.
6-16-3
Bemelmans R.
Ramanathan R.[11]
6-16-0
Kwon S.[9]
Basic M.
7-646-4
Novak D.[5]
Jubb P.
7-57-5
Duckworth J.
Polansky P.[8]
6-747-646-3
Soeda G.
Otte O.[12]
6-26-3
Ito T.
Granollers M.[4]
6-37-5
Ofner S.[10]
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ymer M.[15]
Eubanks C.
6-43-66-2
Evans D.[1]
Draper J.
7-56-3
R64
Duckworth J.
Clarke J.
6-42-0
Koepfer D.
Troicki V.
6-40-0
Bemelmans R.
Harris A.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Couacaud E.
6-46-2
Ito T.
Kubler J.
6-46-4
Peniston R.
Klein B.
4-66-46-4
Kamke T.
Broady L.
6-47-5
Sugita Y.
Zhang Z.
6-33-66-3
Napolitano S.
Ward J.
7-57-61
Escobedo E.
Aragone J.
6-766-47-67
Basic M.
Hoyt E.
6-47-65
Jubb P.
Zopp J.
6-776-46-4
Soeda G.
Ilkel C.
6-26-0
Myneni S.
Moraing M.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.
Watanuki Y.
6-17-63
Draper J.
Chung Y.
5-76-06-2