Ruben Bemelmans vs Andrew Harris — Nottingham CH Round of 64

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2019
grass
AUS
Andrew Harris
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW
Bemelmans R.
6-3 6-2
Harris A.
Bemelmans R.
662
Harris A.
320

Ruben Bemelmans defeated Andrew Harris 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham CH round of 64 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Andrew Harris came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ruben Bemelmans claimed a first win over Andrew Harris in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ1hardAndrew Harris6-4 5-7 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Bemelmans R.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Harris A.

Harris A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bemelmans R.Harris A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bemelmans R.Harris A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
28
Break points saved·Dominant
87
44
Break points won·Slight edge
7
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
9
52

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Donskoy E.[13]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Donskoy E.[13]
Hoang A.[14]
6-36-2
Evans D.[1]
Soeda G.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.
Rosol L.[16]
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Koepfer D.
7-666-766-4
Hoang A.[14]
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[13]
Novak D.[5]
6-7157-57-66
R16
Koepfer D.
Ofner S.[10]
6-22-0
Evans D.[1]
Ymer M.[15]
6-22-67-5
Rosol L.[16]
Ito T.
6-46-706-3
Hoang A.[14]
Peniston R.
7-636-2
Bemelmans R.
Maden Y.[6]
4-66-36-4
Donskoy E.[13]
Karlovic I.[3]
6-36-777-66
Novak D.[5]
Kwon S.[9]
7-646-3
Soeda G.
Duckworth J.
7-646-2
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.[2]
7-621-0
Donskoy E.[13]
Escobedo E.
7-56-4
Hoang A.[14]
Kamke T.
5-76-46-2
Karlovic I.[3]
Napolitano S.
7-644-66-3
Koepfer D.
Majchrzak K.[7]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[16]
Smith J.
6-16-746-3
Maden Y.[6]
Sugita Y.
6-16-3
Bemelmans R.
Ramanathan R.[11]
6-16-0
Kwon S.[9]
Basic M.
7-646-4
Novak D.[5]
Jubb P.
7-57-5
Duckworth J.
Polansky P.[8]
6-747-646-3
Soeda G.
Otte O.[12]
6-26-3
Ito T.
Granollers M.[4]
6-37-5
Ofner S.[10]
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ymer M.[15]
Eubanks C.
6-43-66-2
Evans D.[1]
Draper J.
7-56-3
R64
Duckworth J.
Clarke J.
6-42-0
Koepfer D.
Troicki V.
6-40-0
Bemelmans R.
Harris A.
6-36-2
Smith J.
Couacaud E.
6-46-2
Ito T.
Kubler J.
6-46-4
Peniston R.
Klein B.
4-66-46-4
Kamke T.
Broady L.
6-47-5
Sugita Y.
Zhang Z.
6-33-66-3
Napolitano S.
Ward J.
7-57-61
Escobedo E.
Aragone J.
6-766-47-67
Basic M.
Hoyt E.
6-47-65
Jubb P.
Zopp J.
6-776-46-4
Soeda G.
Ilkel C.
6-26-0
Myneni S.
Moraing M.
7-626-3
Eubanks C.
Watanuki Y.
6-17-63
Draper J.
Chung Y.
5-76-06-2