Sumit Nagal vs Constant Lestienne — Poznan CH Round of 64

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Nagal S.
6-3 5-7 6-3
Lestienne C.
Nagal S.
6562
Lestienne C.
3731

Sumit Nagal defeated Constant Lestienne 6-3 5-7 6-3 in the Poznan CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
86
Break points won·Even
35
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
26
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Lestienne C.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Robredo T.
Molleker R.[15]
5-76-46-1
Semi-finals
Molleker R.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
6-46-4
Robredo T.
Vavassori A.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[1]
Sousa P.[5]
6-16-4
Vavassori A.
Giannessi A.[13]
7-656-1
Robredo T.
Mager G.[8]
5-77-56-3
Molleker R.[15]
Halys Q.[10]
6-42-66-4
R16
Giannessi A.[13]
Masur D.
7-644-66-3
Vavassori A.
Otte O.[9]
7-636-2
Robredo T.
Novak D.[3]
6-35-76-2
Mager G.[8]
Baldi F.[12]
6-16-1
Molleker R.[15]
Kolar Z.
4-66-16-4
Halys Q.[10]
Ofner S.[7]
6-42-66-3
Sousa P.[5]
Domingues J.[11]
6-33-66-3
Hurkacz H.[1]
Lopez Perez E.[14]
6-46-3
R32
Masur D.
Carballes Baena R.[2]
5-0
Giannessi A.[13]
Nagal S.
7-53-66-3
Vavassori A.
Martinez P.[6]
6-46-4
Novak D.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-06-4
Robredo T.
Rola B.[16]
6-47-63
Baldi F.[12]
Hernandez J.
3-67-626-0
Lopez Perez E.[14]
Griekspoor T.
7-646-3
Hurkacz H.[1]
Altmaier D.
7-656-0
Kolar Z.
Ymer E.[4]
3-66-46-1
Domingues J.[11]
Bangoura S.
6-46-1
Mager G.[8]
Heyman C.
7-636-4
Ofner S.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-766-2
Halys Q.[10]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Molleker R.[15]
Durasovic V.
6-46-3
Sousa P.[5]
Vatutin A.
6-22-66-4
Otte O.[9]
Bega A.
1-67-636-3
R64
Masur D.
Zuk K.
6-47-62
Vavassori A.
Varillas J.
6-35-76-4
Gombos N.
Arguello F.
6-707-657-65
Bangoura S.
Marek W.
6-46-1
Arnaboldi A.
Rondoni P.
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Lestienne C.
6-35-76-3
Bega A.
Dembek M.
6-36-3
Ortega Olmedo R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-756-4
Robredo T.
Berrettini J.
6-26-756-1
Hernandez J.
Brancaccio R.
7-57-65
Heyman C.
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Durasovic V.
Zhang Z.
6-42-67-62
Kolar Z.
Grills J.
6-16-3
Griekspoor T.
Michalski D.
4-66-36-2
Altmaier D.
Gabashvili T.
6-06-4