Vit Kopriva vs Jaroslav Pospisil — Prostejov CH Round of 64

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
CZE
Jaroslav Pospisil
45 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Kopriva V.
6-3 6-1
Pospisil J.
Kopriva V.
662
Pospisil J.
310

Vit Kopriva defeated Jaroslav Pospisil 6-3 6-1 in the Prostejov CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kopriva V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pospisil J.

Pospisil J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kopriva V.Pospisil J.
19
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kopriva V.Pospisil J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kopriva V.Pospisil J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
5
Break points saved·Dominant
83
39
Break points won·Dominant
66
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
16
Tiebreaks·
61
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kopriva V.Pospisil J.
Freshness·
88
—

Kopriva V.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Andujar P.[3]
Balazs A.[11]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[3]
Ruud C.[1]
6-26-4
Balazs A.[11]
Torebko P.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Balazs A.[11]
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
6-45-76-4
Torebko P.
Arevalo M.
6-36-727-63
Andujar P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-06-2
Ruud C.[1]
Gaio F.[10]
6-31-66-4
R16
Balazs A.[11]
Haerteis J.
W/O
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Ehrat S.
6-17-65
Arevalo M.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
6-34-66-1
Torebko P.
Kopriva V.
4-66-46-4
Hassan B.
Galan D.[9]
6-43-66-2
Andujar P.[3]
Safwat M.[13]
6-46-3
Gaio F.[10]
Kovalik J.[5]
6-06-4
Ruud C.[1]
Safranek V.
6-16-1
R32
Torebko P.
Ramos A.[2]
6-45-77-5
Ruud C.[1]
Denolly C.
4-66-36-2
Balazs A.[11]
Ignatik U.
5-76-36-4
Andujar P.[3]
Wang T.
6-06-1
Safwat M.[13]
Molcan A.
6-756-16-4
Safranek V.
Miedler L.[14]
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Darcis S.[16]
6-756-36-4
Ehrat S.
Vesely J.[4]
3-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
De Bakker T.[12]
7-56-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Maamoun K.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Nys H.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-4
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[7]
7-644-66-1
Galan D.[9]
Lehecka J.
6-07-66
Kovalik J.[5]
Rinderknech A.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[10]
Nejedly P.
6-06-4
R64
Nejedly P.
Jaloviec M.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Pospisil J.
6-36-1
Nys H.
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.
Satral J.
6-24-66-1
Rinderknech A.
Petrovic D.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-26-1
Haerteis J.
Lock B.
2-66-26-3
Torebko P.
Robert S.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-47-60
Ignatik U.
Patael B.
4-66-26-2
Hassan B.
Bortolotti M.
6-746-06-2
Safranek V.
Jebavy R.
6-13-66-4
Denolly C.
Sakamoto P.
7-656-2
Ehrat S.
Dima D.
3-66-37-5