Lukas Lacko vs Peter Gojowczyk — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
grass
GER13
Peter Gojowczyk
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
Lacko L.
7-6 7-6
Gojowczyk P.
Lacko L.
79772
Gojowczyk P.
67640

Lukas Lacko defeated Peter Gojowczyk 7-6 7-6 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Peter Gojowczyk came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Lukas Lacko narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22MontpellierQ2hardPeter Gojowczyk6-2 6-1
2018-02-19Delray BeachR32hardPeter Gojowczyk3-6 7-5 6-1
2017-07-03WimbledonQ3grassPeter Gojowczyk7-5 6-2 6-3
2015-06-15HalleQ1grassLukas Lacko7-6(5) 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Gojowczyk P.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Gojowczyk P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Gojowczyk P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
61
Break points saved·Even
86
89
Break points won·Dominant
8
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[4]
Troicki V.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.[4]
Copil M.[6]
7-636-746-4
Troicki V.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-657-5
Quarter-finals
Troicki V.
Karlovic I.[8]
6-25-77-64
Kudla D.[5]
Bachinger M.[15]
7-647-5
Evans D.[4]
Granollers M.[10]
6-46-2
Copil M.[6]
Ebden M.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Granollers M.[10]
Tomic B.[7]
7-6126-3
Copil M.[6]
Schnur B.[9]
6-36-3
Evans D.[4]
Bolt A.[16]
5-76-26-0
Karlovic I.[8]
Lopez F.[11]
1-67-657-64
Troicki V.
Polansky P.[14]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Ward J.
6-34-66-3
Ebden M.[2]
Lacko L.
7-57-64
Bachinger M.[15]
Kwon S.
2-67-657-64
R32
Copil M.[6]
Basic M.
6-27-5
Lacko L.
Gojowczyk P.[13]
7-677-64
Kwon S.
Gray A.
6-27-5
Kudla D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Evans D.[4]
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-26-0
Schnur B.[9]
Klein B.
6-36-3
Ward J.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-746-36-4
Bachinger M.[15]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-3
Lopez F.[11]
Brands D.
5-76-36-4
Bolt A.[16]
Ilkel C.
7-646-1
Granollers M.[10]
Koepfer D.
6-27-62
Tomic B.[7]
Paul T.
6-43-66-3
Karlovic I.[8]
Sugita Y.
7-626-756-3
Polansky P.[14]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Troicki V.
Humbert U.[1]
6-756-06-3
R64
Koepfer D.
Glasspool L.
6-47-62
Donskoy E.
Clarke J.
7-56-756-3
Basic M.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Sugita Y.
Hoyt E.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Watson A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Kamke T.
6-33-66-1
Lacko L.
Brown D.
6-36-2
Klein B.
Harris A.
2-66-36-4
Paul T.
Horansky F.
6-46-716-4
Kubler J.
Broady L.
4-66-26-0
Kwon S.
Aragone J.
6-46-1
Brands D.
Peniston R.
6-33-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
6-43-67-67
Ward J.
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.
Saville L.
6-46-3
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.
6-736-36-2