Alessandro Giannessi vs Sumit Nagal — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA13
Alessandro Giannessi
36 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Giannessi A.
7-5 3-6 6-3
Nagal S.
Giannessi A.
7362
Nagal S.
5631

Alessandro Giannessi defeated Sumit Nagal 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alessandro Giannessi came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Alessandro Giannessi extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-01-15Australian OpenQ1hardAlessandro Giannessi7-6(5) 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Giannessi A.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Giannessi A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giannessi A.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giannessi A.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
69
Break points won·Clear edge
20
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Giannessi A.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Robredo T.
Molleker R.[15]
5-76-46-1
Semi-finals
Molleker R.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
6-46-4
Robredo T.
Vavassori A.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[1]
Sousa P.[5]
6-16-4
Vavassori A.
Giannessi A.[13]
7-656-1
Robredo T.
Mager G.[8]
5-77-56-3
Molleker R.[15]
Halys Q.[10]
6-42-66-4
R16
Giannessi A.[13]
Masur D.
7-644-66-3
Vavassori A.
Otte O.[9]
7-636-2
Robredo T.
Novak D.[3]
6-35-76-2
Mager G.[8]
Baldi F.[12]
6-16-1
Molleker R.[15]
Kolar Z.
4-66-16-4
Halys Q.[10]
Ofner S.[7]
6-42-66-3
Sousa P.[5]
Domingues J.[11]
6-33-66-3
Hurkacz H.[1]
Lopez Perez E.[14]
6-46-3
R32
Masur D.
Carballes Baena R.[2]
5-0
Giannessi A.[13]
Nagal S.
7-53-66-3
Vavassori A.
Martinez P.[6]
6-46-4
Novak D.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-06-4
Robredo T.
Rola B.[16]
6-47-63
Baldi F.[12]
Hernandez J.
3-67-626-0
Lopez Perez E.[14]
Griekspoor T.
7-646-3
Hurkacz H.[1]
Altmaier D.
7-656-0
Kolar Z.
Ymer E.[4]
3-66-46-1
Domingues J.[11]
Bangoura S.
6-46-1
Mager G.[8]
Heyman C.
7-636-4
Ofner S.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-766-2
Halys Q.[10]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Molleker R.[15]
Durasovic V.
6-46-3
Sousa P.[5]
Vatutin A.
6-22-66-4
Otte O.[9]
Bega A.
1-67-636-3
R64
Masur D.
Zuk K.
6-47-62
Vavassori A.
Varillas J.
6-35-76-4
Gombos N.
Arguello F.
6-707-657-65
Bangoura S.
Marek W.
6-46-1
Arnaboldi A.
Rondoni P.
7-636-4
Vatutin A.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Lestienne C.
6-35-76-3
Bega A.
Dembek M.
6-36-3
Ortega Olmedo R.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-756-4
Robredo T.
Berrettini J.
6-26-756-1
Hernandez J.
Brancaccio R.
7-57-65
Heyman C.
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Durasovic V.
Zhang Z.
6-42-67-62
Kolar Z.
Grills J.
6-16-3
Griekspoor T.
Michalski D.
4-66-36-2
Altmaier D.
Gabashvili T.
6-06-4