Casper Ruud vs Federico Gaio — Prostejov CH Quarter-final

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
ITA10
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Ruud C.
6-3 1-6 6-4
Gaio F.
Ruud C.
6162
Gaio F.
3641

Casper Ruud defeated Federico Gaio 6-3 1-6 6-4 in the Prostejov CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Gaio F.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
76
Break points won·Dominant
75
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Gaio F.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Andujar P.[3]
Balazs A.[11]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[3]
Ruud C.[1]
6-26-4
Balazs A.[11]
Torebko P.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Balazs A.[11]
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
6-45-76-4
Torebko P.
Arevalo M.
6-36-727-63
Andujar P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-06-2
Ruud C.[1]
Gaio F.[10]
6-31-66-4
R16
Balazs A.[11]
Haerteis J.
W/O
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Ehrat S.
6-17-65
Arevalo M.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
6-34-66-1
Torebko P.
Kopriva V.
4-66-46-4
Hassan B.
Galan D.[9]
6-43-66-2
Andujar P.[3]
Safwat M.[13]
6-46-3
Gaio F.[10]
Kovalik J.[5]
6-06-4
Ruud C.[1]
Safranek V.
6-16-1
R32
Torebko P.
Ramos A.[2]
6-45-77-5
Ruud C.[1]
Denolly C.
4-66-36-2
Balazs A.[11]
Ignatik U.
5-76-36-4
Andujar P.[3]
Wang T.
6-06-1
Safwat M.[13]
Molcan A.
6-756-16-4
Safranek V.
Miedler L.[14]
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Darcis S.[16]
6-756-36-4
Ehrat S.
Vesely J.[4]
3-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
De Bakker T.[12]
7-56-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Maamoun K.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Nys H.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-4
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[7]
7-644-66-1
Galan D.[9]
Lehecka J.
6-07-66
Kovalik J.[5]
Rinderknech A.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[10]
Nejedly P.
6-06-4
R64
Nejedly P.
Jaloviec M.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Pospisil J.
6-36-1
Nys H.
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.
Satral J.
6-24-66-1
Rinderknech A.
Petrovic D.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-26-1
Haerteis J.
Lock B.
2-66-26-3
Torebko P.
Robert S.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-47-60
Ignatik U.
Patael B.
4-66-26-2
Hassan B.
Bortolotti M.
6-746-06-2
Safranek V.
Jebavy R.
6-13-66-4
Denolly C.
Sakamoto P.
7-656-2
Ehrat S.
Dima D.
3-66-37-5