Daniel Evans vs Viktor Troicki — Surbiton CH Final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Daniel Evans
GBR4
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1584Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
grass
SRB
Viktor Troicki
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Evans D.
6-2 6-3
Troicki V.
Evans D.
662
Troicki V.
230

Daniel Evans defeated Viktor Troicki 6-2 6-3 in the Surbiton CH final on grass. The result followed the form book — Daniel Evans came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Troicki V.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Troicki V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Troicki V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
73
62
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
91
Break points won·Dominant
61
27
Deciding sets·Even
82
86
Tiebreaks·Even
66
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Troicki V.
Freshness·
100
—

Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[4]
Troicki V.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.[4]
Copil M.[6]
7-636-746-4
Troicki V.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-657-5
Quarter-finals
Troicki V.
Karlovic I.[8]
6-25-77-64
Kudla D.[5]
Bachinger M.[15]
7-647-5
Evans D.[4]
Granollers M.[10]
6-46-2
Copil M.[6]
Ebden M.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Granollers M.[10]
Tomic B.[7]
7-6126-3
Copil M.[6]
Schnur B.[9]
6-36-3
Evans D.[4]
Bolt A.[16]
5-76-26-0
Karlovic I.[8]
Lopez F.[11]
1-67-657-64
Troicki V.
Polansky P.[14]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Ward J.
6-34-66-3
Ebden M.[2]
Lacko L.
7-57-64
Bachinger M.[15]
Kwon S.
2-67-657-64
R32
Copil M.[6]
Basic M.
6-27-5
Lacko L.
Gojowczyk P.[13]
7-677-64
Kwon S.
Gray A.
6-27-5
Kudla D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Evans D.[4]
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-26-0
Schnur B.[9]
Klein B.
6-36-3
Ward J.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-746-36-4
Bachinger M.[15]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-3
Lopez F.[11]
Brands D.
5-76-36-4
Bolt A.[16]
Ilkel C.
7-646-1
Granollers M.[10]
Koepfer D.
6-27-62
Tomic B.[7]
Paul T.
6-43-66-3
Karlovic I.[8]
Sugita Y.
7-626-756-3
Polansky P.[14]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Troicki V.
Humbert U.[1]
6-756-06-3
R64
Koepfer D.
Glasspool L.
6-47-62
Donskoy E.
Clarke J.
7-56-756-3
Basic M.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Sugita Y.
Hoyt E.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Watson A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Kamke T.
6-33-66-1
Lacko L.
Brown D.
6-36-2
Klein B.
Harris A.
2-66-36-4
Paul T.
Horansky F.
6-46-716-4
Kubler J.
Broady L.
4-66-26-0
Kwon S.
Aragone J.
6-46-1
Brands D.
Peniston R.
6-33-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
6-43-67-67
Ward J.
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.
Saville L.
6-46-3
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.
6-736-36-2