Casper Ruud vs Corentin Denolly — Prostejov CH Round of 32

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#439ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Ruud C.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Denolly C.
Ruud C.
4662
Denolly C.
6321

Casper Ruud defeated Corentin Denolly 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Prostejov CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Denolly C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Denolly C.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Denolly C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Denolly C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
50
Break points saved·Dominant
99
72
Break points won·Dominant
75
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
83
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Denolly C.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Andujar P.[3]
Balazs A.[11]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[3]
Ruud C.[1]
6-26-4
Balazs A.[11]
Torebko P.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Balazs A.[11]
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
6-45-76-4
Torebko P.
Arevalo M.
6-36-727-63
Andujar P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-06-2
Ruud C.[1]
Gaio F.[10]
6-31-66-4
R16
Balazs A.[11]
Haerteis J.
W/O
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Ehrat S.
6-17-65
Arevalo M.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
6-34-66-1
Torebko P.
Kopriva V.
4-66-46-4
Hassan B.
Galan D.[9]
6-43-66-2
Andujar P.[3]
Safwat M.[13]
6-46-3
Gaio F.[10]
Kovalik J.[5]
6-06-4
Ruud C.[1]
Safranek V.
6-16-1
R32
Torebko P.
Ramos A.[2]
6-45-77-5
Ruud C.[1]
Denolly C.
4-66-36-2
Balazs A.[11]
Ignatik U.
5-76-36-4
Andujar P.[3]
Wang T.
6-06-1
Safwat M.[13]
Molcan A.
6-756-16-4
Safranek V.
Miedler L.[14]
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Darcis S.[16]
6-756-36-4
Ehrat S.
Vesely J.[4]
3-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
De Bakker T.[12]
7-56-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Maamoun K.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Nys H.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-4
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[7]
7-644-66-1
Galan D.[9]
Lehecka J.
6-07-66
Kovalik J.[5]
Rinderknech A.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[10]
Nejedly P.
6-06-4
R64
Nejedly P.
Jaloviec M.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Pospisil J.
6-36-1
Nys H.
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.
Satral J.
6-24-66-1
Rinderknech A.
Petrovic D.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-26-1
Haerteis J.
Lock B.
2-66-26-3
Torebko P.
Robert S.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-47-60
Ignatik U.
Patael B.
4-66-26-2
Hassan B.
Bortolotti M.
6-746-06-2
Safranek V.
Jebavy R.
6-13-66-4
Denolly C.
Sakamoto P.
7-656-2
Ehrat S.
Dima D.
3-66-37-5