Ivan Gakhov vs Roberto Cid — Almaty CH Round of 64

Almaty CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Gakhov I.
7-5 6-1
Cid R.
Gakhov I.
762
Cid R.
510

Ivan Gakhov defeated Roberto Cid 7-5 6-1 in the Almaty CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Cid came in defending last year's quarter-final, but Ivan Gakhov had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 7 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Cid R.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
0
Break points saved·Dominant
82
15
Break points won·Clear edge
9
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
4
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Giustino L.[5]
Coria F.[13]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[5]
Vilella Martinez M.
7-54-66-2
Coria F.[13]
Hanfmann Y.[6]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-31-66-3
Coria F.[13]
Nedovyesov A.[8]
7-646-4
Hanfmann Y.[6]
Martin A.[4]
6-24-67-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Milojevic N.[3]
6-46-3
R16
Martin A.[4]
Oliveira G.[15]
6-26-1
Coria F.[13]
Istomin D.[2]
6-27-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Huesler M.
6-46-1
Milojevic N.[3]
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
6-13-66-3
Giustino L.[5]
Giraldo S.[10]
6-16-3
Tabilo A.
Kuhn N.
6-07-60
Nedovyesov A.[8]
Karlovskiy E.[11]
6-26-3
Hanfmann Y.[6]
Kotov P.
6-26-4
R32
Oliveira G.[15]
Manafov V.
6-47-5
Kuhn N.
Jaziri M.[1]
7-667-62
Giraldo S.[10]
Wu T.
2-66-36-2
Nedovyesov A.[8]
Collarini A.
6-36-1
Istomin D.[2]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-4
Coria F.[13]
Gakhov I.
6-45-76-4
Karlovskiy E.[11]
Pavic A.
6-37-64
Martin A.[4]
Wu D.
6-06-4
Kotov P.
Krstin P.[9]
6-36-4
Hanfmann Y.[6]
Safiullin R.
7-56-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Polmans M.[7]
6-27-66
Huesler M.
Santillan A.[12]
3-66-37-65
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
Barrios Vera T.
7-676-1
Milojevic N.[3]
King E.
6-27-5
Giustino L.[5]
Serdarusic N.
3-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Diez S.[14]
6-36-1
R64
Manafov V.
Sultanov K.
7-627-63
Wu D.
Vukic A.
6-42-66-3
Zhurbin A.
Lazarov A.
7-57-5
Tabilo A.
Brkic T.
6-16-3
Gakhov I.
Cid R.
7-56-1
Pavic A.
Mansouri S.
6-36-4
Collarini A.
Skatov T.
6-36-2
Kotov P.
Korda S.
4-67-606-0
Safiullin R.
Purcell M.
6-32-66-0
Vilella Martinez M.
Escobar G.
6-06-4
Huesler M.
Yevseyev D.
6-34-66-4
Barrios Vera T.
Kravchuk K.
6-46-2
King E.
Muller A.
6-45-76-2
Serdarusic N.
Bonadio R.
6-36-4
Wu T.
Sakharov G.
6-36-4
Kuhn N.
Golubev A.
6-32-66-2