Daniel Brands vs Ryan Peniston — Surbiton CH Round of 64

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
GER
Daniel Brands
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
grass
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1440Grass ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Brands D.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Peniston R.
Brands D.
6362
Peniston R.
3631

Daniel Brands defeated Ryan Peniston 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 64 on grass. The result followed the form book — Daniel Brands came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Brands closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brands D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Brands D.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brands D.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brands D.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
20
Break points saved·Dominant
90
60
Break points won·Clear edge
7
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
49
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[4]
Troicki V.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.[4]
Copil M.[6]
7-636-746-4
Troicki V.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-657-5
Quarter-finals
Troicki V.
Karlovic I.[8]
6-25-77-64
Kudla D.[5]
Bachinger M.[15]
7-647-5
Evans D.[4]
Granollers M.[10]
6-46-2
Copil M.[6]
Ebden M.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Granollers M.[10]
Tomic B.[7]
7-6126-3
Copil M.[6]
Schnur B.[9]
6-36-3
Evans D.[4]
Bolt A.[16]
5-76-26-0
Karlovic I.[8]
Lopez F.[11]
1-67-657-64
Troicki V.
Polansky P.[14]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Ward J.
6-34-66-3
Ebden M.[2]
Lacko L.
7-57-64
Bachinger M.[15]
Kwon S.
2-67-657-64
R32
Copil M.[6]
Basic M.
6-27-5
Lacko L.
Gojowczyk P.[13]
7-677-64
Kwon S.
Gray A.
6-27-5
Kudla D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Evans D.[4]
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-26-0
Schnur B.[9]
Klein B.
6-36-3
Ward J.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-746-36-4
Bachinger M.[15]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-3
Lopez F.[11]
Brands D.
5-76-36-4
Bolt A.[16]
Ilkel C.
7-646-1
Granollers M.[10]
Koepfer D.
6-27-62
Tomic B.[7]
Paul T.
6-43-66-3
Karlovic I.[8]
Sugita Y.
7-626-756-3
Polansky P.[14]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Troicki V.
Humbert U.[1]
6-756-06-3
R64
Koepfer D.
Glasspool L.
6-47-62
Donskoy E.
Clarke J.
7-56-756-3
Basic M.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Sugita Y.
Hoyt E.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Watson A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Kamke T.
6-33-66-1
Lacko L.
Brown D.
6-36-2
Klein B.
Harris A.
2-66-36-4
Paul T.
Horansky F.
6-46-716-4
Kubler J.
Broady L.
4-66-26-0
Kwon S.
Aragone J.
6-46-1
Brands D.
Peniston R.
6-33-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
6-43-67-67
Ward J.
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.
Saville L.
6-46-3
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.
6-736-36-2