Marius Copil vs Mirza Basic — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU6
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
grass
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Copil M.
6-2 7-5
Basic M.
Copil M.
672
Basic M.
250

Marius Copil defeated Mirza Basic 6-2 7-5 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Mirza Basic came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Marius Copil narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-30WashingtonR64hardMarius Copil7-6(9) 6-4
2018-02-05SofiaFhardMirza Basic7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-4
2016-01-18Australian OpenQ2hardMirza Basic6-3 7-6(1)

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
33
Break points saved·Dominant
91
56
Break points won·Even
3
4
Deciding sets·Even
63
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[4]
Troicki V.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.[4]
Copil M.[6]
7-636-746-4
Troicki V.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-657-5
Quarter-finals
Troicki V.
Karlovic I.[8]
6-25-77-64
Kudla D.[5]
Bachinger M.[15]
7-647-5
Evans D.[4]
Granollers M.[10]
6-46-2
Copil M.[6]
Ebden M.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Granollers M.[10]
Tomic B.[7]
7-6126-3
Copil M.[6]
Schnur B.[9]
6-36-3
Evans D.[4]
Bolt A.[16]
5-76-26-0
Karlovic I.[8]
Lopez F.[11]
1-67-657-64
Troicki V.
Polansky P.[14]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Ward J.
6-34-66-3
Ebden M.[2]
Lacko L.
7-57-64
Bachinger M.[15]
Kwon S.
2-67-657-64
R32
Copil M.[6]
Basic M.
6-27-5
Lacko L.
Gojowczyk P.[13]
7-677-64
Kwon S.
Gray A.
6-27-5
Kudla D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Evans D.[4]
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-26-0
Schnur B.[9]
Klein B.
6-36-3
Ward J.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-746-36-4
Bachinger M.[15]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-46-3
Lopez F.[11]
Brands D.
5-76-36-4
Bolt A.[16]
Ilkel C.
7-646-1
Granollers M.[10]
Koepfer D.
6-27-62
Tomic B.[7]
Paul T.
6-43-66-3
Karlovic I.[8]
Sugita Y.
7-626-756-3
Polansky P.[14]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Troicki V.
Humbert U.[1]
6-756-06-3
R64
Koepfer D.
Glasspool L.
6-47-62
Donskoy E.
Clarke J.
7-56-756-3
Basic M.
Moriya H.
7-656-4
Sugita Y.
Hoyt E.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Watson A.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Kamke T.
6-33-66-1
Lacko L.
Brown D.
6-36-2
Klein B.
Harris A.
2-66-36-4
Paul T.
Horansky F.
6-46-716-4
Kubler J.
Broady L.
4-66-26-0
Kwon S.
Aragone J.
6-46-1
Brands D.
Peniston R.
6-33-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
6-43-67-67
Ward J.
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.
Saville L.
6-46-3
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.
6-736-36-2