Marcelo Arevalo vs Guillermo Garcia Lopez — Prostejov CH Round of 16

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESA
Marcelo Arevalo
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
ESP6
Guillermo Garcia Lopez
43 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Arevalo M.
6-3 4-6 6-1
Garcia Lopez G.
Arevalo M.
6462
Garcia Lopez G.
3611

Marcelo Arevalo defeated Guillermo Garcia Lopez 6-3 4-6 6-1 in the Prostejov CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Guillermo Garcia Lopez came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Marcelo Arevalo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Arevalo M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Garcia Lopez G.

Garcia Lopez G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Arevalo M.

Serve advantage — Arevalo M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Arevalo M.Garcia Lopez G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Arevalo M.Garcia Lopez G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
88
Break points won·Clear edge
15
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
14
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Andujar P.[3]
Balazs A.[11]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[3]
Ruud C.[1]
6-26-4
Balazs A.[11]
Torebko P.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Balazs A.[11]
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
6-45-76-4
Torebko P.
Arevalo M.
6-36-727-63
Andujar P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-06-2
Ruud C.[1]
Gaio F.[10]
6-31-66-4
R16
Balazs A.[11]
Haerteis J.
W/O
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Ehrat S.
6-17-65
Arevalo M.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
6-34-66-1
Torebko P.
Kopriva V.
4-66-46-4
Hassan B.
Galan D.[9]
6-43-66-2
Andujar P.[3]
Safwat M.[13]
6-46-3
Gaio F.[10]
Kovalik J.[5]
6-06-4
Ruud C.[1]
Safranek V.
6-16-1
R32
Torebko P.
Ramos A.[2]
6-45-77-5
Ruud C.[1]
Denolly C.
4-66-36-2
Balazs A.[11]
Ignatik U.
5-76-36-4
Andujar P.[3]
Wang T.
6-06-1
Safwat M.[13]
Molcan A.
6-756-16-4
Safranek V.
Miedler L.[14]
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Darcis S.[16]
6-756-36-4
Ehrat S.
Vesely J.[4]
3-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
De Bakker T.[12]
7-56-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Maamoun K.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Nys H.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-4
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[7]
7-644-66-1
Galan D.[9]
Lehecka J.
6-07-66
Kovalik J.[5]
Rinderknech A.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[10]
Nejedly P.
6-06-4
R64
Nejedly P.
Jaloviec M.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Pospisil J.
6-36-1
Nys H.
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.
Satral J.
6-24-66-1
Rinderknech A.
Petrovic D.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-26-1
Haerteis J.
Lock B.
2-66-26-3
Torebko P.
Robert S.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-47-60
Ignatik U.
Patael B.
4-66-26-2
Hassan B.
Bortolotti M.
6-746-06-2
Safranek V.
Jebavy R.
6-13-66-4
Denolly C.
Sakamoto P.
7-656-2
Ehrat S.
Dima D.
3-66-37-5