Pablo Andujar vs Casper Ruud — Prostejov CH Semi-final

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ESP3
Pablo Andujar
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2019
clay
Casper Ruud
NOR1
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Andujar P.
6-2 6-4
Ruud C.
Andujar P.
662
Ruud C.
240

Pablo Andujar defeated Casper Ruud 6-2 6-4 in the Prostejov CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Casper Ruud came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Pablo Andujar claimed a first win over Casper Ruud in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-05-17GenevaSFclayCasper Ruud6-3 6-2
2020-02-10Buenos AiresR32clayCasper Ruud6-2 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Andujar P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Andujar P.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Andujar P.Ruud C.
—
Serve
58
—
Return
70

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Andujar P.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andujar P.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
38
91
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
99
Break points won·Dominant
40
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Andujar P.Ruud C.
Freshness·
—
100

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Andujar P.[3]
Balazs A.[11]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[3]
Ruud C.[1]
6-26-4
Balazs A.[11]
Torebko P.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Balazs A.[11]
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
6-45-76-4
Torebko P.
Arevalo M.
6-36-727-63
Andujar P.[3]
Hassan B.
6-06-2
Ruud C.[1]
Gaio F.[10]
6-31-66-4
R16
Balazs A.[11]
Haerteis J.
W/O
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Ehrat S.
6-17-65
Arevalo M.
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
6-34-66-1
Torebko P.
Kopriva V.
4-66-46-4
Hassan B.
Galan D.[9]
6-43-66-2
Andujar P.[3]
Safwat M.[13]
6-46-3
Gaio F.[10]
Kovalik J.[5]
6-06-4
Ruud C.[1]
Safranek V.
6-16-1
R32
Torebko P.
Ramos A.[2]
6-45-77-5
Ruud C.[1]
Denolly C.
4-66-36-2
Balazs A.[11]
Ignatik U.
5-76-36-4
Andujar P.[3]
Wang T.
6-06-1
Safwat M.[13]
Molcan A.
6-756-16-4
Safranek V.
Miedler L.[14]
6-26-3
Kopriva V.
Darcis S.[16]
6-756-36-4
Ehrat S.
Vesely J.[4]
3-66-36-4
Arevalo M.
De Bakker T.[12]
7-56-4
Garcia Lopez G.[6]
Maamoun K.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[15]
Nys H.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-4
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[7]
7-644-66-1
Galan D.[9]
Lehecka J.
6-07-66
Kovalik J.[5]
Rinderknech A.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[10]
Nejedly P.
6-06-4
R64
Nejedly P.
Jaloviec M.
6-26-2
Kopriva V.
Pospisil J.
6-36-1
Nys H.
De Schepper K.
6-36-4
Lehecka J.
Satral J.
6-24-66-1
Rinderknech A.
Petrovic D.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-26-1
Haerteis J.
Lock B.
2-66-26-3
Torebko P.
Robert S.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-47-60
Ignatik U.
Patael B.
4-66-26-2
Hassan B.
Bortolotti M.
6-746-06-2
Safranek V.
Jebavy R.
6-13-66-4
Denolly C.
Sakamoto P.
7-656-2
Ehrat S.
Dima D.
3-66-37-5