Sumit Nagal vs Dmitry Popko — Samarkand CH Round of 16

Samarkand CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND15
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2019
clay
Dmitry Popko
KAZ
Dmitry Popko
#629ATP
1385ELO
1334Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Nagal S.
7-6 6-3
Popko D.
Nagal S.
7962
Popko D.
6730

Sumit Nagal defeated Dmitry Popko 7-6 6-3 in the Samarkand CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Popko D.

Popko D.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Popko D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Popko D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
3
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
54
Break points won·Clear edge
35
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Popko D.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
86

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Popko D.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Menezes J.
Moutet C.[1]
7-627-67
Semi-finals
Menezes J.
Nagal S.[15]
5-76-46-3
Moutet C.[1]
Martin A.[3]
6-40-66-2
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[1]
Oliveira G.[7]
6-25-2
Menezes J.
Ignatik U.[6]
6-26-4
Nagal S.[15]
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
7-56-4
Martin A.[3]
Hernandez J.[9]
6-44-66-2
R16
Ignatik U.[6]
Blanch U.[10]
7-656-727-65
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Miedler L.[5]
7-636-2
Oliveira G.[7]
Maamoun K.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[15]
Popko D.
7-676-3
Menezes J.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-1
Hernandez J.[9]
Vukic A.
7-656-3
Martin A.[3]
Cid R.[14]
6-36-4
Moutet C.[1]
Kotov P.[13]
4-66-26-3
R32
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Fomin S.
6-46-3
Yevseyev D.
Arevalo M.[16]
7-663-66-3
Oliveira G.[7]
Durasovic V.
6-36-2
Maamoun K.
Safiullin R.[11]
6-47-63
Menezes J.
Nedovyesov A.[4]
6-16-4
Vukic A.
Clezar G.[8]
7-56-4
Cid R.[14]
Olivo R.
3-66-26-3
Miedler L.[5]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-33-67-5
Blanch U.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-654-66-2
Hernandez J.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-46-776-2
Kotov P.[13]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Escoffier A.
1-66-36-1
Nagal S.[15]
Doumbia S.
6-41-66-1
Popko D.
Gerasimov E.[2]
6-37-61
Martin A.[3]
Tiurnev E.
6-36-4
R64
Popko D.
Grills J.
6-37-63
Doumbia S.
Gakhov I.
4-66-37-611
Ruusuvuori E.
Ornago F.
6-36-756-3
Menezes J.
Nabiev O.
6-06-1
Vukic A.
Torebko P.
6-16-0
Boluda Purkiss C.
Golubev A.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-736-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Kadhe A.
6-06-3
Zhurbin A.
Simon T.
7-696-787-5
Olivo R.
Marchenko I.
6-26-2
Durasovic V.
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Maamoun K.
Bourchier H.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Fayziev S.
6-36-0
Gabashvili T.
Ismailov T.
6-16-0
Fomin S.
Sultanov K.
7-633-66-2
Tiurnev E.
Manafov V.
1-66-36-2