Zhe Li vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN13
Zhe Li
#1964ATP
39 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2019
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Li Z.
7-5 7-6
Mukund S.
Li Z.
7772
Mukund S.
5640

Zhe Li defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 7-5 7-6 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sasi Kumar Mukund came in defending last year's round of 32, but Zhe Li had been the form player, winning 7 of their last 10 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Li Z.

Serve advantage — Li Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Li Z.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li Z.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
0
Break points saved·Dominant
58
20
Break points won·Clear edge
18
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jung J.[5]
Sela D.[12]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Sela D.[12]
Kwon S.[6]
6-47-5
Jung J.[5]
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Jung J.[5]
Li Z.[13]
3-66-16-4
Kwon S.[6]
Wu T.
6-16-0
Sela D.[12]
Donskoy E.[4]
7-646-2
Santillan A.
Lacko L.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Lacko L.[7]
Ilkel C.
2-64-0
Santillan A.
Schnur B.[3]
6-33-0
Kwon S.[6]
Sugita Y.[10]
6-46-756-4
Wu T.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
6-46-3
Donskoy E.[4]
Chung Y.
7-56-4
Sela D.[12]
Kravchuk K.
6-16-1
Jung J.[5]
Bemelmans R.[9]
6-27-5
Li Z.[13]
Mukund S.
7-57-64
R32
Chung Y.
Lee D.[15]
6-46-2
Kravchuk K.
Ito T.[8]
6-32-1
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Yang T.
6-47-63
Mukund S.
Takahashi Y.
6-16-4
Sugita Y.[10]
Nam J.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.[4]
Ochi M.
6-36-4
Sela D.[12]
Smith R.
6-06-2
Lacko L.[7]
Bai Y.
7-666-4
Ilkel C.
Purcell M.[11]
6-16-717-5
Santillan A.
Myneni S.[16]
6-26-1
Schnur B.[3]
Saville L.
6-26-736-2
Jung J.[5]
Song M.
6-36-2
Bemelmans R.[9]
Peliwo F.
7-646-2
Li Z.[13]
Imai S.
6-36-1
Wu T.
Uchida K.[14]
6-16-4
Kwon S.[6]
Broady L.
6-27-62
R64
Song M.
Song E.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Son J.
7-652-66-3
Smith R.
Wu D.
6-26-4
Santillan A.
Kim C.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Banes M.
3-66-46-2
Yang T.
Na J.
6-37-68
Broady L.
King E.
7-56-3
Chung Y.
Lee J.
7-656-2
Saville L.
Neuchrist M.
6-716-27-62
Mukund S.
Setkic A.
6-16-3
Wu T.
Zhang Z.
6-36-3
Nam J.
Noguchi R.
6-26-1
Ochi M.
Hsieh C.
4-67-56-3
Kravchuk K.
Hong S.
3-67-636-2
Ilkel C.
King K.
7-56-2
Peliwo F.
Xia Z.
6-46-4