Sumit Nagal vs Sadio Doumbia — Samarkand CH Round of 32

Samarkand CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND15
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2019
clay
FRA
Sadio Doumbia
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
Nagal S.
6-4 1-6 6-1
Doumbia S.
Nagal S.
6162
Doumbia S.
4611

Sumit Nagal defeated Sadio Doumbia 6-4 1-6 6-1 in the Samarkand CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Doumbia S.

Doumbia S.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Doumbia S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Doumbia S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
19
Break points saved·Dominant
69
30
Break points won·Clear edge
35
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Doumbia S.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Menezes J.
Moutet C.[1]
7-627-67
Semi-finals
Menezes J.
Nagal S.[15]
5-76-46-3
Moutet C.[1]
Martin A.[3]
6-40-66-2
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[1]
Oliveira G.[7]
6-25-2
Menezes J.
Ignatik U.[6]
6-26-4
Nagal S.[15]
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
7-56-4
Martin A.[3]
Hernandez J.[9]
6-44-66-2
R16
Ignatik U.[6]
Blanch U.[10]
7-656-727-65
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Miedler L.[5]
7-636-2
Oliveira G.[7]
Maamoun K.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[15]
Popko D.
7-676-3
Menezes J.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-1
Hernandez J.[9]
Vukic A.
7-656-3
Martin A.[3]
Cid R.[14]
6-36-4
Moutet C.[1]
Kotov P.[13]
4-66-26-3
R32
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Fomin S.
6-46-3
Yevseyev D.
Arevalo M.[16]
7-663-66-3
Oliveira G.[7]
Durasovic V.
6-36-2
Maamoun K.
Safiullin R.[11]
6-47-63
Menezes J.
Nedovyesov A.[4]
6-16-4
Vukic A.
Clezar G.[8]
7-56-4
Cid R.[14]
Olivo R.
3-66-26-3
Miedler L.[5]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-33-67-5
Blanch U.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-654-66-2
Hernandez J.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-46-776-2
Kotov P.[13]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Escoffier A.
1-66-36-1
Nagal S.[15]
Doumbia S.
6-41-66-1
Popko D.
Gerasimov E.[2]
6-37-61
Martin A.[3]
Tiurnev E.
6-36-4
R64
Popko D.
Grills J.
6-37-63
Doumbia S.
Gakhov I.
4-66-37-611
Ruusuvuori E.
Ornago F.
6-36-756-3
Menezes J.
Nabiev O.
6-06-1
Vukic A.
Torebko P.
6-16-0
Boluda Purkiss C.
Golubev A.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-736-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Kadhe A.
6-06-3
Zhurbin A.
Simon T.
7-696-787-5
Olivo R.
Marchenko I.
6-26-2
Durasovic V.
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Maamoun K.
Bourchier H.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Fayziev S.
6-36-0
Gabashvili T.
Ismailov T.
6-16-0
Fomin S.
Sultanov K.
7-633-66-2
Tiurnev E.
Manafov V.
1-66-36-2