Sadio Doumbia vs Ivan Gakhov — Samarkand CH Round of 64

Samarkand CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
FRA
Sadio Doumbia
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2019
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Doumbia S.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Gakhov I.
Doumbia S.
467132
Gakhov I.
636111

Sadio Doumbia defeated Ivan Gakhov 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Samarkand CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ivan Gakhov came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Doumbia S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Doumbia S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Doumbia S.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Doumbia S.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
34
Break points saved·Dominant
30
82
Break points won·Even
11
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
65
59
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
32
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Menezes J.
Moutet C.[1]
7-627-67
Semi-finals
Menezes J.
Nagal S.[15]
5-76-46-3
Moutet C.[1]
Martin A.[3]
6-40-66-2
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[1]
Oliveira G.[7]
6-25-2
Menezes J.
Ignatik U.[6]
6-26-4
Nagal S.[15]
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
7-56-4
Martin A.[3]
Hernandez J.[9]
6-44-66-2
R16
Ignatik U.[6]
Blanch U.[10]
7-656-727-65
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Miedler L.[5]
7-636-2
Oliveira G.[7]
Maamoun K.
6-46-4
Nagal S.[15]
Popko D.
7-676-3
Menezes J.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-1
Hernandez J.[9]
Vukic A.
7-656-3
Martin A.[3]
Cid R.[14]
6-36-4
Moutet C.[1]
Kotov P.[13]
4-66-26-3
R32
Ortega Olmedo R.[12]
Fomin S.
6-46-3
Yevseyev D.
Arevalo M.[16]
7-663-66-3
Oliveira G.[7]
Durasovic V.
6-36-2
Maamoun K.
Safiullin R.[11]
6-47-63
Menezes J.
Nedovyesov A.[4]
6-16-4
Vukic A.
Clezar G.[8]
7-56-4
Cid R.[14]
Olivo R.
3-66-26-3
Miedler L.[5]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-33-67-5
Blanch U.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-654-66-2
Hernandez J.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-46-776-2
Kotov P.[13]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[1]
Escoffier A.
1-66-36-1
Nagal S.[15]
Doumbia S.
6-41-66-1
Popko D.
Gerasimov E.[2]
6-37-61
Martin A.[3]
Tiurnev E.
6-36-4
R64
Popko D.
Grills J.
6-37-63
Doumbia S.
Gakhov I.
4-66-37-611
Ruusuvuori E.
Ornago F.
6-36-756-3
Menezes J.
Nabiev O.
6-06-1
Vukic A.
Torebko P.
6-16-0
Boluda Purkiss C.
Golubev A.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-736-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Kadhe A.
6-06-3
Zhurbin A.
Simon T.
7-696-787-5
Olivo R.
Marchenko I.
6-26-2
Durasovic V.
Klein B.
6-43-66-3
Maamoun K.
Bourchier H.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Fayziev S.
6-36-0
Gabashvili T.
Ismailov T.
6-16-0
Fomin S.
Sultanov K.
7-633-66-2
Tiurnev E.
Manafov V.
1-66-36-2