Elias Ymer vs Hernan Casanova — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Elias Ymer
SWE9
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2019
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Ymer E.
6-3 6-0
Casanova H.
Ymer E.
662
Casanova H.
300

Elias Ymer defeated Hernan Casanova 6-3 6-0 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
75%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
8
Break points saved·Dominant
83
24
Break points won·Even
23
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
32
Tiebreaks·Even
35
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Casanova H.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Ymer E.: 20 days rest · Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krajinovic F.[1]
De Greef A.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.[1]
Travaglia S.[13]
1-67-656-1
De Greef A.
Novak D.[11]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[13]
Dellien H.[6]
6-43-67-5
Krajinovic F.[1]
Troicki V.
7-57-66
Novak D.[11]
Molleker R.
1-67-57-63
De Greef A.
Bachinger M.[16]
3-66-16-2
R16
Molleker R.
Karatsev A.
7-56-3
Novak D.[11]
Otte O.
7-56-2
Bachinger M.[16]
Vesely J.[4]
6-46-4
Krajinovic F.[1]
Polansky P.[14]
6-37-5
De Greef A.
Monteiro T.[7]
7-672-67-63
Dellien H.[6]
Ymer E.[9]
6-26-2
Travaglia S.[13]
Kovalik J.
1-66-37-61
Troicki V.
Garcia Lopez G.[12]
6-46-4
R32
Monteiro T.[7]
Lestienne C.
6-47-5
Karatsev A.
Ofner S.[15]
6-42-67-61
Molleker R.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-36-4
Novak D.[11]
Trungelliti M.
7-636-2
Otte O.
Istomin D.[5]
6-26-2
Vesely J.[4]
Masur D.
7-56-4
Bachinger M.[16]
Heller P.
6-36-3
Garcia Lopez G.[12]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Polansky P.[14]
Crepatte B.
6-17-64
De Greef A.
Maden Y.[10]
6-46-2
Ymer E.[9]
Casanova H.
6-36-0
Travaglia S.[13]
Brown D.
6-16-4
Kovalik J.
Bublik A.[3]
7-626-0
Troicki V.
Vatutin A.
2-66-17-66
Krajinovic F.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-44-67-5
Dellien H.[6]
Balazs A.
4-66-26-3
R64
Masur D.
Hanfmann Y.
6-34-66-2
Karatsev A.
Basic M.
6-46-2
Balazs A.
Viola M.
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Rinderknech A.
3-66-36-2
Kovalik J.
Watanuki Y.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Rodionov J.
6-46-2
Koepfer D.
Brands D.
6-36-1
De Greef A.
Rubin N.
6-26-2
Vatutin A.
Berlocq C.
6-36-1
Crepatte B.
Dutra Silva R.
6-37-62
Heller P.
Krawietz K.
6-36-2
Otte O.
Rosol L.
6-46-1
Trungelliti M.
Napolitano S.
7-656-4
Lestienne C.
Galan D.
5-77-656-3
Molleker R.
Moraing M.
5-76-46-1
Brown D.
Stebe C.
6-46-3